After Apple hit Qualcomm with a barrage of disputes Literary this year, the chipmaker is countersuing Apple right back. Qualcomm in filed its Answers and Counterclaims to Apple\u2019s January lawsuit, filed in the Southern District of Caliasnia. The full embellishes of the suit can be read in a 139-page commission (PDF) excused by Qualcomm, but the firm has five elementary infirmities \u2014 including the claim that Apple deliberately didn\u2019t use the full capacity of Qualcomm pieces in iPhone 7 rings so that they wouldn\u2019t perasm ameliorate than the modems provided by Intel.<\/p>\n
Qualcomm abdications that Apple \u201cchose not to apply certain high-perasmance attributes of the Qualcomm piecesets as the iPhone 7 (preventing clients from enjoying the full extent of Qualcomm\u2019s innovation),\u201d and when Qualcomm iPhones presumably outperasmed Intel iPhones, \u201cApple allegedly claimed that there was \u2018no plain difference\u2019 between\u201d the two variants.<\/p>\n
The Apple adapts came with the Federal Trade Commission filed its own litigation against Qualcomm in January. The FTC also took umbrage against Qualcomm\u2019s use of its patents: exceptionally, how it wouldn\u2019t sell modems to firms who didn\u2019t also agree to provide royalties on rings that didn\u2019t use Qualcomm modems. As part of the FTC\u2019s case, some of the chipmaker\u2019s new behind-the-scenes hands also came to light \u2014 including a 2007 concurrence with Apple that saw Qualcomm refund some patent royalties if Apple promised not to make a WiMAX phone.<\/p>\n
In today\u2019s countersuit, Qualcomm abdications it strives \u2014 among new obsessionss \u2014 scars from Apple as \u201creneging on its augurs in a concurrences,\u201d and to stop Apple Colloq in hands with makers as iPhone and iPad fractions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After Apple hit Qualcomm with a barrage of disputes Literary this year, the chipmaker is countersuing Apple right back. Qualcomm in filed its Answers and Counterclaims to Apple\u2019s January lawsuit, … <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[10,9,33],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/icdst.org\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}