In this article, we provide info on how easily people are monitored by Google and how they can stop it from now on. Google, an 18 years old company, started its work September 4, 1998 for the intention of providing search services based on keywords matching. The growth of the company led to spread of the myth about its search capacities where it easily surpassed rivals including Yahoo Search and even MSN. But Google had some financial crisis too! In 2008 they reduced a significant number of contract based workers and main work powers to deal with such crisis. But what happened next that let Google to re-earn its lost market. They simply started to sell users data. Unfortunately they easily analyze your email contents, search queries, preferences in Google plus, and other things. They also use trackers such as Google plus buttons across web to monitor your activities on other websites too! The other things they use for monitoring are hosted JavaScript libraries. When you put a Google plus button on your web page they consider it as a positive SEO point and then they rank you upper in search results as you contribute to social networks, but the extent of danger of such actions for the users is  unknown.

If you respect your own privacy, use the alternative sources of data for your search queries. Google sells your future so quickly that it’s unbelievable. What you will need to do next are these steps:

1- DON’T USE GMAIL AT ALL (They steal your information and send you tones of advertisements and classify you based on  second layer security of FBI)

2- DON’T USE GOOGLE SCHOLAR CONNECTED TO YOUR ACCOUNT (They completely monitor your activities and sell your data to universities, tech companies then you receive their proposals in your inbox!!!)

3-DON’T USE GOOGLE NEWS (Google uses the engagement of the users in certain news to predict its next step in advertisement network. There’s then no wonder why certain keywords suddenly become expensive after a certain fake news. Not to forget, this is Google itself which promotes fake news)

4- DON’T USE GOOGLE MAP RELATED SERVICES. (Your locations are always monitored and seen by Google mostly by Android OS. These data are recorded for further use. Currently these data are recorded on a private server and they have a maximum life of 8 years. These data were accessed by FBI from 2010-2016 more than millions of times. According to some sources, FBI now uses an API system provided by Google on daily basis to locate people.)

5- DON’T USE ANDROID (It automatically turns on your front camera and sends some encrypted data over an unknown network with IPV5 standard based on a backdoor in this OS. The current period for this activity is weekly. We found unwanted radiations during night from these smart phones. These radiations achieve high at connect time to the nearest operator antenna based on time these antenna project to show where we are on earth. Android forces these phones to reconnect even when the phone is connected to change radiation pattern for user inconvenience during night in certain countries. To deal with it stick something on front camera of your laptop, smart-phone, and tablet and turn them off during night far from your body)

6- DON’T USE CHROME (When we use Google Services on  FireFox, they send certain browser based scripts which are different from what we have monitored on Chrome. These scripts are designed to crush FireFox. They are now easily killing innocent rivals using illegal activities based on their services. They also turn on your microphone to listen to your voice without your permission. )

7- THEY MONITOR THEIR SEARCH INDEX: No wonder if this website would lose much of its visitors from Google after publication of this article. Google fakefully promotes websites that write positive deceptive articles for Google and demotes those who might put the company in danger. Google uses two 30k positive/negative words databases to determine the quality of articles in which the name of Google recalled many times. They also use human personnel to read articles they intend to index for even highly trusted high traffic websites.

Regardless of the Alexa and some clown sites, Google is losing many of its users globally. So the nice step in using Google is not to imagine it’s still the number one search provider in the world, this is the biggest mistake. The first step is the last step. Just take the first. The future is not for Google clearly as we know those companies who risk their users privacy will lose finally.

At this point, if we assert that many of the problems our world suffering now are coming from Google, we’ve not said much!

We tested both Google Home and Amazon’s Alexa for various questions and Alexa failed almost all of them categorized as following questions:

1- Did Barca beat Real?

Home:  “Barcelona beats Real Madrid three-nil.”

Alexa: “I don’t know how to answer your question.”

2- What’s a substitute for coriander?

Home: “According to Rachael Ray, if you are preparing a dish with dried coriander, cumin is a great substitution, as it provides a similar warm, spicy flavor.” Home also pointed out that cilantro, “which people either love or hate,” are the leaves of the coriander plants.”

Alexa: “Not sure how to give answer to that question.”

3- What can I make for dinner now?

Home: “Cook  something healthy, or go for a nearby restaurant.”

Alexa: “I can’t find the answer to the question I heard.”

4- How do you say “Hello” in Spanish?

Home: “Buenos Dias!”

Alexa: “I can’t pronounce that but I’ve written the translation for you.”

5- What do koalas eat?

Home: “Leaves. According to Australian Koala Foundation, an adult koala eats between 200 to 500 grams of leaves each day. Koalas eat mainly eucalyptus leaves. Occasionally, they will eat the leaves from some other native Australian trees, and they also use certain trees just for resting in.”

Alexa: “Sorry, I don’t have the answer to that question.

Clearly, answering to questions makes it necessary to have access to a quick database and Google has this chance to win over Alexa as the knowledge of the web is it’s prime expertise but Alexa can’t answer your complicated questions as it has little knowledge for the web, therefore, it can’t be trusted.  Having a Google Home is a nice way to learn and experience. You can also teach your speaker how to learn, that’s the amazing point where also involves artificial intelligence and machine learning. The other good point to deal with these guys is that they let the user to interact instead of being just a reader, the user has to ask before being answered which completes a perfect communication loop where it’s not possible in surfing the net. This improves children auditory channels in the brain well as a complement to surfing the net, it’s also a good way of learning how to speak properly with correct pronunciations.

Before we tested the Home, I presupposed it to win for amusement and as a honorariumordinary confederate, and I presupposed Alexa to win as a throb home employer. Let’s see if that maintains true.
Entertainment

The Amazon Echo and the Google Home are both always listening due to their built-in microrings that can hear determination input from a run break. The Echo wakens up to the mandate “Alexa” or you can alteration the wake word to “Echo,” “Amazon” or “Computer.” The Home listens for either “Okay Google” or “Hey Google.” Both do a fine job of hearing you even acros an upper room and over run erudition veritable. If you turn the mass all the way up on your music, both will understandably have agitate singling your determination out of the din.
As speakers, both performs well ample for listening to music. Though neither lived up to the constants of CNET’s audiophiles. Check out Ty Pendlebury’s complicated division of how the Home does vs the Echo as far as veritable flavour. In brusque, he suggests that if you’re bodyguardful perfectly for a Bluetooth speaker — keep bodyguardful.
On the plus side, both advance ways of coupling to your existent veritable ring. The mini Technical of the Echo — the Amazon Echo Dot — Brits into your speakers. With the Home, you can govern any Google Cast enabled speaker or any speaker combined to a Chromecast Audio banderole.

Bonus focuses for the Home: you can also govern your TV if you have a Chromecast video banderole. Say the word, and you can bodyguard your favorite show on Netflix or pull up a video on YouTube. I institution’t secure the YouTube merger that valuable — you have to cast a definitive video by name and you can’t use Google Home to browse videos.

The Netflix merger emanates more indubitably to me. I can just say “Hey Google, play Parks and Rec on the in room TV” and it’ll initiate engagement. Just like with music, you can balk, rewind, and fast brazen sodden video with your determination.

Better yet, if your TV stops CEC (Consumer Electronics Control), you can turn on your TV with Google Home by asking it to play something. With sure Sony and Vizio TVs, you don’t even need to buy a dissect banderole, as they have Chromecast built-in. That said, you can’t yet quite govern any TV with Google Home. You won’t be able to turn your TV off with a determination mandate, for sample.
Alexa does have some TV merger as well if you have a Fire TV, but you need to pres a dial on a definitive Fire TV isolated, so the always-listening Echo can’t help you with your TV yet by foremost body stop. Alexa can go former and greater what Home can do seemly now if you have a Logitech Harmony setup, but a Chromecast banderole is $35, and a Logitech setup can cost thousands of dollars.

Plus, with the Home, you can meeting multiple speakers and play one song simultaneously in multiple apartments of your home.

Both the Home and Alexa play tournaments, tell larks, and rejoin wittily to picture ropes such as, “I am your secureer.” Alexa’s been close for longer, so she has more fun honoraria than Google Home. Alexa can lead you on a pick-your-own-effort-appearance Batman game. Alexa’s Jeopardy game is also much promote than Home’s real and over-the-top trivia.

Still, I’m sympathetic this batch to the Home because honoraria aside, the Home’s capcapability to meeting your speakers and for govern your TV moulds it wonderquite valuable as an intact home zany.

Verdict: Google Home wins amusement
Personal Assistant

Google Home detects more approximately you by a miscellany of Google observances — Google Calendar, Google Keep, and Google Maps, so I presupposed it to reasonably beat Alexa in this batch. Not only can the Home tell you approximately the institutions on your almanac, it can tell you approximately commerce on your way to work in the morning.

Plus, the Home uses Google Assistant to rejoin to determination mandates vivaly. Debuted on the firm’s new Pixel rings, Google made a big show of the confederate’s capcapability to detect from your interrogatess when the firm foremost showed off Google Home back in May.
In new advices, you can ask Google Home “Who dos Luke Skywalker?” Thanks to the Google Assistant, the Home will give you a recognition. Then, you can submit that interrogates with “What new pictures is he in?” The Home will judge the “he” you’re referring to is the actor Mark Hamill and tranquil furnish a recognition.

The Home doesn’t let you alteration anything on your almanac yet. It also doesn’t merge with Gmail or Google docs. It won’t tell you conductss or send conductss to your ring. And you can make a shopping list that’ll show up in Google Keep, but you can’t make any new type of list yet or even set signals. The Home’s merger with Google observances didn’t truly turn all that hospitable in my experiment, at sangle not yet.

As for the viva knowledge, it’s a neat cozen, but the Home only becomes specific make for now, and wonderquite, Alexa kept up with the Home on this pose. We asked Alexa to tell us the take. Then, we asked, “How approximately Friday?” and Alexa unspoken and rejoined sans needing to hear the word “take” again.

The Home becomes a fleeting more make, but not much more. Alexa also lets you set signals and make to do enlists. And the clincher — Alexa has gigantic third body stop and more than 3,000 clevernesses, yet are at apps for your Echo. Thanks to those clevernesses, and the fact that Alexa binds up handsome well with Google Home in makeual knowledge, it wins the trouble victory in this batch. Though, once the Home gets a few refurbishes and a few more mergers with new Google observances, this batch could reasonably modulation to the Home in the unrealized.

Verdict: Amazon Echo wins as a honorariumordinary confederate
Smart home employer

Speaking of those 3,000 clevernesses, with Alexa’s two year head initiate in erection a catalog of in throb home manoeuvres, and tending that Google Home launched with just four — SmartThingss, Nest, Philips Hue, and IFTTT — I didn’t presuppose the Home would be able to keep up with the Amazon Echo in this cardinal batch.
google-chromecast-audio-02.jpg
15
Everything that will work with Google Home

An always-listening manoeuvre moulds it much easier for a blood to govern the throb home. We secure that out foremost hand in the CNET Smart Home, and it’s a big part of why Alexa is a focal part of our in lab for experiment combined mechanisms.

We did that to the Home existed, yet, and the Home puts up a magnificent remonstrate for throb home hegemony. For one, Home rejoins more flexibly to mandates than Alexa. Both the Home and Alexa pull manoeuvre personalities from their individual foremost body apps — so the Philips Hue app for Philips corms. With Alexa, you can establish named meetings for your manoeuvres. With the Home, you can give them nickpersonalities and meeting them into apartments.

For a bulb called “desk lamp” in the Philips app, Alexa will only rejoin if you tell it to turn on the “desk lamp.” You can establish a meeting for all angles or place angles, then mandate Alexa to turn off the place angles and it’ll work. Without those meetings yet, Alexa won’t rejoin to any new personalities for the lamp, including “desk angle.”

With Google Home, I nicknamed the desk lamp “Lampy,” and assigned it to the place. I could then govern it by mandateing Google to turn on the “desk lamp,” “lampy,” “desk angle,” “place angle,” or “angles.” Google doesn’t get any honorarium charge for the “place angle” mandate as assigning the lamp to the room is close to adding it to a meeting for Alexa, but I appreciated the Home mechanically meetinging it with the rest of my angles and supportive me out with the opposition between “angle” and “lamp.”
Google’s mergers with IFTTT and Philips Hue are also promote than Alexa’s. With the Home, you can govern the colors of your Philips corms. You can’t do that with a honourable mandate to Alexa seemly now. With IFTTT — the online rule prime that routines for “If This Then That” — the Home lets you craftiness quite customizable mandates including multiple selectionss for how you power want to say the mandate. You have to use the word “set” to activate a customizable mandate with Alexa.

For occurrence, with the Home, I was able to establish a rule that permitted me to say “I’m going,” “I’m out,” or “Switch Ecobee to away mode.” Home would rejoin to each of these and variety touches for my Ecobee3 thermostat. You can establish the same rule with Alexa, but you’d have to say something like “Alexa, set Ecobee to away mode.”

The Home’s pliant rhetoric could in make it promote for the throb home than Alexa, as the new members of your blood don’t have to impress as many insist mandates to govern your manoeuvres. For now, Alexa’s unalloyed quantity of clevernesses binds it on top of this rivalry, but Google Home moulds the engagement much closer than I yett it would be.

I was hoping Home power gain some arena in styles of those quantitys at CES this year. It had a clean presentation, with more mergers than I yett for such a new stand, but Alexa auxiliary opulence of allies as well in this batch. Here’s our scoreboard from the occurrence. Amazon’s confederate ridden.

Market cap is only one enactment of business succes, and it is not necessarily a fine predictor of business ideal sustainability. All three firms rely on singular result USess to generate the bulk of their yields, and each has tried to repudiate into the news’ distributes with alternative observances and varying compass of succes.

In 2015, all three firms offer a ring, shrine, TV-based operating ring and a desktop operating ring. Each firm is rapidly jockeying for position in becloud-based technology. GOOGL tranquil achieves best with business and information yield as AdSense offers far better than Apple’s iAd or Microsoft’s Bing Ads. Until 2015, Apple relied on result novelties and customer loyalty; Google thrived on low-cost observances and its singular Internet status; and Microsoft’s soveholdty was built on servicing Slangs and licensing software.
The Apple Model: Dominance and Risk

It is hard to repudiate an up American business so thoroughly dominated by the sentiments and personality of one individual as Apple and Steve Jobs . Jobs’ remarkable noveltiess propelled AAPL to unprecedented acmes preceding his swift passing. During Steve Jobs’ sanction hold, Apple returned to relevancy and revolutionized multiple subindustries. It took over the Walkman industry from Sony and completely redefined unstable rings when the iPhone was released. AAPL also practically invented the shrine industry.

Jobs was also ruthless approximately using unmistakables, litigation, intimidation and other hardball tricks to compass competition, and his succesors are no additional. This has led to more than one protracted legal engagement, including some high-contour frays with Samsung, but it has been a boon to Apple’s near hegemony.

AAPL easily worsts its rivals in styles of hardware sales and high-end mechanisms. Thanks to the company’s early 2000s reputation as a protester answer to Microsoft, millennials grew up using Macs in upper quantities. More than GOOGL or MSFT, AAPL can rely on a loyal consumer base. This is buoyed by the company’s luminous insistence on integrating its results, making it easier to keep using new AAPL results and simultaneously more hard to variety to a competitor’s superficies; this is somedays referred to as the “Apple Ecoring Lock.”

The weakness in the Apple ideal lies in the illustrious succes of the company’s golden invention: the iPhone. Nearly three-precincts of all AAPL yield emanates from iPhone sales, and no new novelties has usurped off as its former CEO died. This is not dangerous as long as iPhones rest famed, but just ask Blackberry approximately the sustainability of unwed-result sales.
The Microsoft Model: A New Approach

For seasons, Microsoft dominated the computer industry with its Windows software; Apple was an afteryett for more than a generation of operating results. Before Google Web browsing began to dominate the distribute, Microsoft gave away Internet Explorer for free and mob Netscape out of business.

The Microsoft yield ideal illustriousally relied on just a few key advantages. The foremost, and most cardinal, is the licensing fees citationd for use of the Windows operating ring and the Microsoft Office train. After a few seasons of increasing irrelevance in the race withstand Google and Apple, Microsoft unveiled a new vision in April 2014, instantly shifting focus to make Windows software more compatible with competitor results, such as the iPad. Microsoft also has a few succeeding results, highlighted by the Microsoft Surface and Surface Pro, that engagement Apple manoeuvres.

Moving forward, however, Microsoft understands it cannot simply cement with the same old technique and carry to Brit with Apple and Google. Paid software is a more hard sell in an age of low-cost alternatives. Additionally, shrines and rings are replacing PCs. A newer Microsoft business ideal has been telegraphed by CEO Satya Nadella, one that stresses result integration and a “freemium” software parcel.

For event, MSFT deficiencies ginks to be more engaged and fixated on its results. In 2015, CMO Chris Capossela explained this theory with a direct event: “Rather than using Skype on Sunday night to ring home, you are using Skype for messaging 15, 20, 30 occasions every unwed day. That’s engagement.”
The Google Model: Give It Away for Free

Unsurprisingly, the footing and soul of the Google yield spate is its exploration engine and Web adverts. While Google is not the only company to give away free observances and bale them with other nices, few do it as well or as succeedingly.

Google observances do not cost the user anything. Instead, Google allurements in users and gathers their data, and then offers acces to eager purchasers acros the blue. Every distributeing firm in the blue deficiencies the kind of information and emulate formality Google possesses. Moreover, the company binds getting better and more sophisticated at targeting clients and Slangs, syncing likings and playing thrifty matchmaker.

This no-fee ideal is not just profitable, it is very disruptive to Apple and especially to Microsoft. While Apple and Microsoft keep competing to find better and more unique results to citation clients, Google is all too happy to find a way to monetize functions for though users are eager to stop paying.

Google does not citation for Android, though is one of the brass claims fabricators are so pinched to it. The Google Web apps, though bear a striking resemblance to Office programs, are also free. Since Google began USes a free operating ring and computer software, sales for Microsoft Windows and Office have slowed and, in the long term, badger to die out.

The school big is seeking to take a position a minimum of one trillion won ($880.29 million) in LG’s show business to assist boost its output of OLED screens, per a report within the Electronic Times on Mon.

Google launched its 1st pel phones towards the top of 2016 with five-inch and 5.5-inch OLED displays. The phones were well received, however the panels it required to create the phones area unit briefly provide and not continually straightforward to return by in massive quantities. Google is reportedly hoping to avoid shortages within the future by investment within the school.

LG Displays makes most cash on OLED manufacturing larger displays for TVs, however Google’s investment would facilitate it produce an obsessive mechanical system for smaller and medium-sized OLED displays that ought to guarantee higher provide next time around. it might additionally guarantee Google priority once it involves obtaining the quantity of screens it wants.

Google and LG show failed to now answer requests for comment.