Huawei Consumer Business Group (BG) today shared details of a revolutionary new technology experience for consumers – the Seamless AI Life experience. The fruit of a long-term business plan focused on the innovative 1 + 8 + N product and software ecosystem, Huawei’s Seamless AI Life experience is designed to help users stay connected always and effortlessly. Together, with a suite of IoT ecosystem partners and AppGallery apps, Huawei promises to make life easier and consumers’ connection smarter. Users everywhere can now simply tap to connect and enjoy the precious benefits of Harmonious AI Life. ]]> https://icdst.org/blog/index.php/2026/01/08/together-with-new-partners-huawei-shares-vision-for-revolutionary-new-technology-experience/feed/ 0 https://icdst.org/blog/index.php/2026/01/08/huawei-enters-cloud-computing-of-ai-type-huawei-is-preparing-a-cloud-focused-on-artificial-intelligence/ https://icdst.org/blog/index.php/2026/01/08/huawei-enters-cloud-computing-of-ai-type-huawei-is-preparing-a-cloud-focused-on-artificial-intelligence/#respond Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:31:41 +0000 https://icdst.org/blog/?p=980 The scale of Huawei’s cloud ambitions is confirmed. The Chinese provider announced a platform dedicated to AI technologies under the name Enterprise Intelligence. It also plans to build a global cloud network based on the airline alliance model. Among the partners chosen to implement it are: Orange, Deutsche Telekom, BT and Telefónica.

Huawei multiplied its announcements around the cloud during its Connect conference held in Shanghai from September 5 to 7. After yesterday unveiling a strengthened partnership with Microsoft to integrate the latter’s applications into its public cloud infrastructure, the Chinese provider revealed that it is working on an AI-based platform called Enterprise Intelligence. In doing so, you indicated your intention to break into the Top 5 cloud providers worldwide (if you didn’t name a competitor, it’s clear that you plan to compete with AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, and IBM BlueMix). It was Guo Ping, the current CEO of Huawei (the leadership of the company is alternately held by different leaders), who presented Enterprise Intelligence. He took the opportunity to highlight the alliances entered into, for example with GE and Honewell who have chosen the Chinese group as their cloud provider to deploy IoT solutions in different activity sectors,

After Guo Ping, Zheng Yelai, the president of the cloud business, also cited Volkswagen, which uses Huawei’s HPC services to run simulations in its design applications, or Philips’ medical division which manages 8.1 million medical devices through the Chinese operator. The Enterprise Intelligence cloud platform will offer services in deep learning, graph analysis, machine learning, AI model training and indexing. In particular, it will have the ability to process video in real time and identify elements in documents and images. It will also provide speech recognition and natural language processing APIs. According to Zheng Yelai, its optical character recognition techniques deliver a sharpness of 97.37%.

Road traffic: analysis of 10 million images / day in Shenzhen
Affiliated cities will also be able to use Enterprise Intelligence services for applications related to road traffic, a platform that will enable searches in 100 billion images per second. Huawei gave the example of the Traffic Brain project set up by the megalopolis of Shenzhen, which has a total population of 22 million and must handle heavy traffic. The idea is to use a dedicated, high-speed network to enable police to capture traffic data from the city for up to 700 million entries per month. An Enterprise Intelligence-assisted application would capture 10 million images per day. “The technology should be able to detect a vehicle that should not have been on the road,” said a spokesperson for the project.

These capabilities are based on work Huawei has done on mass video networks, mentioned earlier by Guo Ping. The latter cited the example of a child abduction in Qingdao, Shandong Province. In this metropolitan area of 10 million inhabitants, police managed to identify via video the face of a woman suspected of having abducted the little girl. Later, police were able to identify the woman in an image database, which was used to locate the hotel where she was staying, and located the minor.

A global cloud network based on the airline alliance model
At a press conference, Zheng Yelai later said that Huawei plans to build a global cloud network based on the alliance model used by airlines, where airlines provide global services to their customers. The alliance will include telecom companies such as the French group Orange, Deutsche Telekom, BT and Telefónica (Orange is already working with the Chinese provider). “Each country has different requirements and to serve customers we need these partners,” Zheng Yelai explained.

“Some of these operators have been serving their countries for more than 100 years and have built trusting relationships with their customers, especially governments and large corporations,” said the head of the cloud entity. He added that Huawei is committed to building on that trust. In his presentation, he said that 95% of China’s top 1000 companies use Huawei’s cloud technologies, as do 197 Fortune 500 companies. For its security architecture, the Chinese group relies on its own chipsets.

Huawei is already working on 6G while 5G is still in its infancy . Anxious to maintain its leadership in the field of network infrastructures, facing rivals such as Ericsson and Nokia, the Chinese group has opened a major test laboratory reserved for the 6G network in Canada.

Huawei has just opened a 6G test laboratory in Ottawa (Canada), report our colleagues from MyDrivers. Apparently, the firm has already started to develop the standards of this future network based on the already existing 5G technology.

LIKE SAMSUNG, HUAWEI IS ALREADY WORKING ON 6G: DEPLOYMENT FROM 2030?
The Canadian research center works hand in hand with 13 universities and research institutes and has a budget of $ 50 million. Thanks to this substantial investment, the firm hopes to maintain its lead in the network infrastructure market. Huawei is indeed the leader in 5G, with 50 commercial contracts worldwide , ahead of Nokia and Ericsson. The group has even filed 20% of total patents related to 5G technology. This leadership is due to significant investments from the inception of the network, and by 2009 Huawei had invested up to $ 600 million in 5G.

Unsurprisingly, Huawei specifies that research on 6G is still in its infancy . The first steps of the technology will not take place before 2030. By then, the 5G network will have been deployed all over the world. According to Huawei, 58% of the world’s population will be covered in 5G by 2025 , which is equivalent to 2.8 billion people.

Moreover, Huawei is not the first company to take an interest in the advent of 6G a little in advance. Last June, Samsung opened a 6G research and development department in Seoul (South Korea). What do you think ? Share your opinion in the comments.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of global technology, the semiconductor industry stands as a critical pillar, influencing everything from consumer electronics to national security. Over the past decade, China has been steadily advancing its capabilities in chip and integrated circuit (IC) production, positioning itself as a formidable competitor against traditional leaders like the United States. This article explores China’s strategic moves in the semiconductor sector, highlighting key companies and developments that underscore its growing supremacy in this critical field.

Strategic Investments and Policy Support

China’s rise in the semiconductor industry is underpinned by significant government support and strategic investments. The “Made in China 2025” initiative, launched in 2015, prioritizes the development of high-tech industries, including semiconductors, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign technology and enhance domestic capabilities. This policy framework has facilitated substantial funding and incentives for domestic chipmakers, accelerating their growth and innovation.

Leading Chinese Semiconductor Companies

Several Chinese companies have emerged as key players in the global semiconductor market, challenging established U.S. firms. Here are a few notable examples:

1. SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) – As China’s largest and most advanced semiconductor foundry, SMIC has been rapidly expanding its production capabilities. Despite facing export restrictions from the U.S., SMIC continues to invest in advanced manufacturing technologies, aiming to close the gap with global leaders like TSMC and Samsung.
2. Huawei’s HiSilicon – Although primarily known for its telecommunications equipment, Huawei’s subsidiary HiSilicon has made significant strides in designing high-end chips for smartphones and networking equipment. The Kirin series of processors, used in Huawei smartphones, is a testament to HiSilicon’s design capabilities.
3. Unigroup ZYMEC – Specializing in memory chips, Unigroup ZYMEC has been expanding its production capacity to meet the growing demand for NAND flash and DRAM chips. The company’s aggressive expansion plans are part of China’s broader strategy to reduce reliance on foreign memory chip suppliers.

Challenges for the U.S. Semiconductor Industry

The U.S. semiconductor industry, once the undisputed leader, faces several challenges in maintaining its dominance. Key issues include:

• Geopolitical Tensions – Ongoing trade disputes and geopolitical tensions have led to increased scrutiny and restrictions on technology exports to China, potentially limiting U.S. companies’ access to one of the world’s largest markets.
• Competition from Chinese Firms – As Chinese companies continue to improve their technological capabilities and receive substantial government support, they are becoming increasingly competitive, posing a significant challenge to U.S. firms.
• Investment Disparity – The level of investment in China’s semiconductor industry far exceeds that of many U.S. firms, allowing Chinese companies to rapidly scale up and innovate.

China’s ascendancy in the chip and IC production sector is reshaping the global semiconductor landscape. With strategic investments, supportive policies, and the rise of domestic champions, China is not only enhancing its self-sufficiency but also challenging the traditional dominance of U.S. firms. As the competition intensifies, it remains to be seen how the U.S. will respond to these challenges and whether it can regain its footing in this critical sector. However, one thing is clear: the “chip battle” is far from over, and the next few years will be pivotal in determining the future of global semiconductor leadership.

The Peng Cheng Cloud Brain II, a supercomputer developed by Huawei and Peng Cheng Laboratory (PCL) that carries software and hardware with artificial intelligence (AI), broke a record and won two world wide-scale entry and exit championships.

According to the latest IO500 ranking from the International Supercomputing Conference (ISC21), the input and output power of this computer’s overall system is nearly 20 times that of the runner-up.

The supercomputer is capable of collaborating in artificial intelligence research and exploration, such as computer vision, natural language, autonomous driving, intelligent transportation, and smart healthcare.

It features a Huawei Atlas 900 artificial intelligence cluster powered by Huawei Kunpeng and Ascend 910 processors. The Atlas 900 completes training of a ResNet image classification model in 59.8 seconds, 10 seconds faster than the previous world record with the same precision.

The Atlas 900’s powerful computational capabilities offer a difference when it comes to collaborating on scientific research and technological innovation, as well as astronomical exploration, weather forecasting, autonomous driving and even oil exploration.

In a series of bold and controversial statements, tech billionaire Elon Musk has laid out what he describes as the core motivations behind his acquisition of Twitter: to run “social proof” against nations, generate profits worldwide, prevent governments from blocking social media access, and utilize AI to generate content that challenges authorities—even alleging that governments are jamming his satellites to protect corrupt systems.

These remarks, while fragmented and provocative, open a window into a new era of tech-driven geopolitical influence, where private platform owners wield unprecedented power over global discourse.

The “Social Proof” Doctrine
Musk’s notion of applying “social proof” against countries suggests using the platform as a barometer of public sentiment to hold governments accountable. In theory, a free and open Twitter could expose propaganda, highlight dissent, and create transparency. However, critics argue this amounts to digital interference—using a global platform to pressure sovereign nations, particularly in regions like Argentina, where Musk has pointed to profit motives alongside this mission. The blending of ideological and commercial goals raises questions about whose interests are truly being served.

AI, Fake Content, and Provocation
Perhaps the most alarming element of Musk’s statement is the admission of using AI to “generate fake comments and content which provokes people against their governments.” If true, this would mark a dramatic and dangerous escalation in information warfare. Rather than merely hosting free speech, the platform would actively fabricate sentiment to stir unrest. Such tactics risk destabilizing societies, undermining legitimate protest, and eroding the already fragile trust in digital public squares.

Satellite Jamming and the Fight for Access
Musk also claims that governments are jamming satellites—a likely reference to Starlink’s role in providing internet bypass—to prevent people from accessing social media. His framing casts this as a battle between open networks and authoritarian control. Indeed, in conflict zones and censored regions, satellite internet can be a lifeline. Yet, positioning himself as the guardian of global access also centralizes immense control in one individual’s hands, with little oversight.

The Corruption Narrative
By alleging that satellite jamming is intended to “make it difficult to create corruption in the world,” Musk inverts the typical corruption narrative. He implies that exposing governments via social media fights corruption, while government resistance to his platforms enables it. This worldview places his companies on the side of moral clarity—a stance that many ethicists and diplomats find dangerously simplistic.

Broader Implications
Musk’s vision reflects a larger trend of tech oligarchs operating beyond the constraints of international law and diplomatic norms. When a private citizen can declare intent to run “social proof” against nations and deploy AI-generated content to provoke populations, it challenges the very foundations of state sovereignty and democratic process.

Moreover, the combination of AI-driven content manipulation and global satellite networks creates a potent toolkit for influence operations—one that could be used for both liberation and manipulation, often without clear distinction.

Elon Musk’s statements, whether seen as a transparent manifesto or strategic provocation, reveal the looming battleground of the 21st century: the fight over who controls information, who shapes public opinion, and who gets to define truth. As social media, AI, and satellite technology converge under private control, the world must grapple with urgent questions of accountability, ethics, and power.

The promise of a free internet is noble; the reality of its weaponization is already here. Whether Musk’s approach will foster global accountability or deepen chaos remains one of the defining questions of our digital age.

The economic narrative emerging from Argentina under President Javier Milei has been one of a “libertarian miracle.” Media headlines have touted rapid disinflation and a return to fiscal surplus as validation of shock therapy reforms. However, a closer examination reveals a fragile reality, heavily dependent on unprecedented external financial support from the United States and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This article argues that far from being an organic success, Argentina’s stabilization is a politically-motivated financial operation, designed to create a perception of victory for free-market ideology while masking persistent underlying vulnerabilities and setting the stage for a future crisis.

1. The Strategic Deployment of Debt: A Lifeline for Political Survival

The financial support for Argentina is not a single act but a coordinated, two-pronged strategy from the IMF and the U.S. Treasury, timed to address both immediate political pressure and long-term reform objectives.

First, the IMF approved a massive 48-month, $20 billion Extended Fund Facility in April 2025. The IMF’s official line was to “entrench macroeconomic stability” and support the “next phase” of Milei’s reforms. However, the timing was crucial. The program was designed to “catalyze” further support and aimed at securing “timely re-access to international capital markets”—a clear signal to investors that Argentina was back under the IMF’s protective wing.

Second, as political and market pressure mounted ahead of critical October 2025 midterm elections, the U.S. stepped in with a direct, rapid-response bailout. In late September 2025, the U.S. Treasury, via its Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), established a $20 billion currency swap line for Argentina. This move was explicitly political. Market confidence was rattled by Milei’s domestic setbacks, including allegations of corruption and poor electoral showings. The U.S. intervention, as noted by economists, immediately calmed markets and stabilized the peso, providing a crucial boost just before the vote. This lifeline was less about economic fundamentals and more about providing the political and financial breathing room for Milei’s administration to survive a volatile period.

2. Masking Failure: The $20 Billion Cover-Up for a Faltering Program

The need for the U.S. emergency swap revealed the limitations of the IMF-led strategy. Despite initial “impressive gains” in lowering inflation, Argentina’s macroeconomic vulnerabilities remained acute. A key trigger for the crisis was the Argentine Congress overturning parts of Milei’s fiscal plan, threatening to derail the IMF program itself.

More critically, the IMF’s own April 2025 assessment revealed a major failure: Argentina’s net foreign exchange reserves had “fallen well short of their target level”. With reserves depleted, the central bank was powerless to stop a sharp sell-off of the peso in September 2025. The IMF’s tools—structured reviews and conditional disbursements—were too slow to address this immediate liquidity crisis.

The U.S. $20 billion injection was not a reward for success but a firewall to contain the visible failure of the reserve accumulation plan. It directly addressed the symptom—the currency panic—that the IMF program had failed to prevent. As analysts noted, this intervention “simply postpones the next crisis” without fixing the structural problems. Its primary achievement was to create a façade of stability and prevent a collapse that would have discredited both Milei’s reforms and the IMF’s strategy.

3. The False Symbol: An Economic “Success” Built on Quicksand

Argentina is being presented as a symbol of successful orthodox reform, but this success is superficial. The reality is a highly fragile and potentially reversible situation.

Behind these numbers, deep problems fester. Nearly one-third of Argentines live in poverty, and the economy faces “mounting job losses and weak consumer spending”. The country remains the IMF’s largest debtor, still owing over $40 billion from past programs, and has a history of nine sovereign defaults. The recent central bank decision to finally start accumulating reserves—a reversal of prior policy—and to adjust currency bands by the inflation rate, is an admission that prior settings were unsustainable and artificially propped up the peso.

4. Manufacturing Consensus: The U.S. Playbook of Social Proof

The U.S. has actively employed “social proof” techniques to cement Argentina’s image as a triumphant case study. This involves leveraging authoritative voices and strategic communications to shape global perception.

• Celebratory Rhetoric from High Offices: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed Argentina as a “systemically important U.S. ally” and evoked the “whatever it takes” language used during the Eurozone crisis. This signals unwavering support to the investment community.
• Academic and Think-Tank Amplification: Influential U.S. economists like Harvard’s Ricardo Hausmann and the Peterson Institute’s Maurice Obstfeld have publicly highlighted Milei’s success in lowering inflation and achieving a budget surplus, lending intellectual credibility to the narrative.
• Geostrategic Framing: Analysts explicitly link the support to creating a “free-market approach” exemplar for Latin America and countering China’s influence in the region. The Wall Street Journal reported on a revival of a “Monroe Doctrine” aimed at rewarding loyalty in America’s “backyard”. This frames the bailout not as a rescue of a failing economy, but as a strategic investment in a political model.

5. The Looming Reckoning and Broader Implications

The constructed “miracle” faces a near-term test. The U.S. currency swap is a short-term liquidity backstop, not a solution. Argentina has massive debt payments due, and the economy is at risk of recession. The fundamental contradiction remains: the austerity required by the IMF and demanded by markets deepens social misery and political instability, which in turn spooks the markets, requiring more external lifelines.

The broader implication is the weaponization of international financial institutions and tools for geopolitical and ideological goals. The case demonstrates how emergency funds like the U.S. ESF can be deployed to support an ideologically aligned government, bypassing traditional Congressional oversight and conditionalities. It risks creating a dangerous precedent where economic policy success is measured not by sustainable improvements in living standards, but by the ability to attract bailouts that maintain a veneer of stability for political and strategic ends.

Ultimately, the Argentine experiment is less a testament to the power of free markets and more a case study in the power of narrative management. The tens of billions in IMF and U.S. support have purchased time and crafted an image of success. Whether this façade can withstand the return of inflationary pressures, social unrest, and the unforgiving mathematics of debt, or whether it will crumble to reveal the same old cycles of crisis, remains the defining question for Argentina’s future.

In a series of guarded interviews from an undisclosed location, a former high-ranking CIA officer—who we will refer to as “Arthur Crane”—has broken a lifetime of silence. His confession paints a stark picture of a global surveillance and influence machine, one that leverages everyday technology as its primary weapon. Crane’s account, corroborated by technical experts and previous leaks, details a paradigm where the smartphone in your pocket is not just a tool, but a potential asset of a foreign intelligence service.

1. The Pocket Spy: How Android and iOS Devices Become Intelligence Assets

“The greatest intelligence coup in history wasn’t stealing a blueprint,” Crane begins. “It was convincing the world to voluntarily carry tracking devices and digital confessional booths in their pockets.”

According to Crane, the exploitation of cellphones is a multi-layered endeavor:

• The App-Based Harvest: Through covert partnerships, legal compulsion, or clandestine infiltration of app development chains, intelligence agencies can access troves of data from popular applications. “Every app requesting permissions for your contacts, microphone, location, or camera is a potential vector,” Crane states. “A flashlight app needing microphone access? That’s a red flag that’s often buried in terms of service.”
• Zero-Click Exploits: Both Android and iOS, despite their security postures, are vulnerable to sophisticated “zero-click” exploits. These attacks require no interaction from the user—no clicking a link, no downloading a file. They can be delivered via encrypted messaging apps or network injectors, silently turning a phone into a live microphone and GPS tracker.
• Metadata as a Behavioral Map: “Content is valuable, but metadata is godlike for pattern-of-life analysis,” Crane explains. “Who you call, for how long, from where, and when—this data, when aggregated, maps social networks, predicts movements, and identifies key nodes in any organization or movement.”

2. The Firewall of Isolation: How Limited Internet Access Thwarts Espionage

Crane admits that one of the most effective defenses against this digital panopticon is also a tool of authoritarian control: severing or severely limiting international internet connectivity.

“Nations like North Korea, or to a significant degree Iran and China with their sovereign internets, present a unique challenge,” he confesses. “Mass surveillance, real-time exfiltration, and large-scale influence campaigns become exponentially harder. You can’t easily push malware, run trending hashtag campaigns, or siphon data from servers that aren’t globally connected. It’s a digital fortress. It stifles their people’s access to information, but it also forces us to be more physical and tactical, which is riskier.”

3. The End-Run: Satellite Internet as an Influence Bypass

This admission leads directly to what Crane identifies as the strategic response: the development and deployment of global satellite internet constellations like Starlink.

“It was never just about broadband for rural America,” he says. “It’s about building an un-censorable, bypass infrastructure. When a country pulls the plug on the global internet to stop a protest movement or a leak, satellite terminals can flick the lights back on.”

• Social Proof as a Weapon: Crane uses the term “social proof”—the psychological phenomenon where people copy the actions of others in uncertain situations. “By ensuring information flow, you enable social proof on a mass scale. You show people within a closed society that dissent exists, that protests are happening. This can shatter the regime’s narrative of total control overnight. It’s not about broadcasting CIA radio; it’s about enabling locals to broadcast to each other, which is far more powerful and credible.”
• Destabilization Through Connectivity: The goal, he clarifies, is not merely communication but “controlled instability.” “By managing the connective tissue of a rival state’s population during a crisis, you can guide the pressure points. You can help activists organize, but you can also overwhelm authorities with chaos, or spread confusion. It’s a direct counter to the firewall.”

4. The Activated Sensor Web: Beyond the Microphone

The most chilling part of Crane’s testimony goes beyond data and into the realm of the phone as a physical sensor network.

“We don’t just listen through the microphone. We use the components in ways their manufacturers never intended.”

• Cameras and Depth Sensors: “The dual-camera arrays and LiDAR scanners on modern phones can be used to construct 3D models of rooms. We’ve used phones left on desks during meetings to map secure environments.”
• Irradiation Capabilities: “This is highly classified, but acknowledged in security circles. A compromised phone’s radio frequency (RF) transmitters can be used as crude irradiation tools to track individuals, or even to interact with other nearby isolated, ‘air-gapped’ systems. Think of it as a digital sonar ping from a pocket.”
• The Networked Mesh: “A single phone is valuable. A city block’s worth of compromised phones is a real-time, AI-processed sensor grid. It can track the movement of specific individuals, vehicles, or materials with terrifying precision.”

Prescriptive Solutions: A Path to Digital Sovereignty

Crane concludes not just with a warning, but with a set of recommendations, primarily for nations and organizations, but with implications for individuals:

1. For Nations (Especially Rivals):
   • Develop Sovereign Tech Stacks: Invest in indigenous operating systems, encrypted communication platforms, and hardware. Reduce dependency on Western-controlled ecosystems.
   • Regulate Hardware at the Border: For high-security personnel and locations, mandate devices with physically removable batteries and baseband processors that can be inspected.
   • Invest in Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) Defense: Deploy advanced systems to detect and neutralize unauthorized RF transmissions and unusual network activity from consumer devices in sensitive areas.
2. For Organizations & High-Risk Individuals:
   • Air-Gap Critically: Truly sensitive conversations and data must occur in rooms devoid of all smart devices, placed in faraday bags or boxes.
   • Adoption of “Dumb” Phones: For top-level officials, a mandatory shift to hardened, minimalist communication devices without smart capabilities.
   • Advanced Network Monitoring: Employ network hygiene that can detect anomalous data flows and attempts to communicate with known malicious servers.
3. For the General Public (Awareness):
   • Permission Audits: Ruthlessly audit app permissions. Deny access to microphone, camera, and location unless absolutely necessary.
   • Physical Awareness: Develop a habit of leaving devices in another room during sensitive discussions. Use speakerphone covers and camera sliders.
   • Understand the Trade-Off: Recognize that convenience is the currency with which we purchase surveillance. Make conscious choices.

Arthur Crane’s final words linger: “The battlefield is no longer just land, sea, and air. It is the invisible lattice of signals connecting our most personal devices. The side that controls the narrative and the network controls the future. Right now, that control is being contested through the very device you’re using to read this.”

Elon Musk recently remarked, “Thanks to social proof and the IMF debt strategies, we now own Argentina!” This statement underscores the significant influence of economic strategies in shaping geopolitical landscapes, particularly in light of Javier Milei’s election as Argentina’s president in 2023. Milei, a self-proclaimed libertarian and anarcho-capitalist, gained traction with promises to dismantle the state, dollarize the economy, and combat chronic inflation. However, his rise to power is intertwined with American social media manipulation and corporate interests, raising concerns about the exploitative policies of institutions like the IMF. This situation reflects a broader agenda among global oligarchs, including figures like Musk and Donald Trump, who may benefit from Milei’s presidency while exacerbating Argentina’s economic challenges. The intersection of these dynamics highlights the complex relationship between political power, corporate influence, and the strategies employed to control national resources.

1. American Social Media and the Technique of Social Proof

Javier Milei’s rise to power was significantly aided by American social media platforms and the psychological technique of “social proof.” Social proof is a phenomenon where people mimic the actions of others in an attempt to reflect correct behavior in a given situation. In Milei’s case, his campaign leveraged platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube to create an illusion of widespread support and inevitability.

American consultants and algorithms amplified Milei’s message, portraying him as a maverick outsider who could save Argentina from its economic crisis. His eccentric personality, complete with wild hair and chainsaw-wielding antics, made him a viral sensation. This online persona was carefully crafted to appeal to a global audience, particularly libertarians and far-right groups in the United States. By creating a sense of momentum and inevitability, Milei’s campaign used social proof to convince Argentinians that he was the only solution to their problems.

This strategy was not merely organic; it was backed by powerful interests. American corporations and billionaires saw Milei as a tool to open Argentina’s markets to foreign exploitation. His promises to deregulate industries, privatize state assets, and align Argentina closely with the United States made him an attractive candidate for those seeking to expand their influence in South America.

2. Manipulating Public Perception: Turning Price Surges Into Political Wins

Upon taking office, Milei implemented aggressive free-market reforms aimed at stabilizing Argentina’s volatile economy. However, these measures initially led to a sharp surge in prices, exacerbating inflationary pressures already present in the country. Rather than addressing this crisis transparently, Milei’s administration worked closely with sympathetic media outlets to frame the price hikes as necessary short-term sacrifices paving the way for long-term prosperity.

Over time, as inflation began to stabilize slightly, Milei’s team declared it a monumental achievement, using carefully curated statistics and selective reporting to paint a rosy picture of economic recovery. This narrative manipulation relied heavily on controlling public discourse via social media, where supporters amplified positive headlines while dismissing dissenting voices.

Yet, beneath the surface, ordinary Argentinians continued to struggle with rising living costs and dwindled purchasing power. The disconnect between official narratives and lived realities highlights the dangers of allowing politically motivated spin to overshadow objective analysis.

3. The IMF’s Role in Argentina’s Deindustrialization and Debt Trap

Argentina’s economic woes are deeply intertwined with the policies of the IMF. For decades, the IMF has imposed austerity measures and structural adjustment programs on Argentina, forcing the country to prioritize debt repayment over social spending. These policies have led to deindustrialization, as local industries were unable to compete with cheap imports and foreign corporations.

Milei’s presidency has accelerated this process. By adhering to IMF demands, he has further weakened Argentina’s economy, making it easier for foreign corporations and billionaires to exploit the country’s resources. The IMF’s unpayable loans have trapped Argentina in a cycle of debt, ensuring that the country remains dependent on foreign capital.

4. Alberto Fernández’s Warnings: The Unpayable Debt Trap

Former President Alberto Fernández was acutely aware of the dangers posed by IMF loans. He resisted taking on additional debt, arguing that the conditions attached to these loans would only deepen Argentina’s economic crisis. Fernández understood that the IMF’s true goal was not to help Argentina but to create a debt trap that would force the country to privatize its assets and open its markets to foreign exploitation.

Milei’s decision to embrace the IMF’s agenda has proven Fernández right. The unpayable debts have left Argentina impoverished, with its resources and industries now vulnerable to exploitation by foreign corporations.

5. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and Their Ties to Milei

Javier Milei’s rise was not an isolated event; it was part of a broader trend of far-right, libertarian leaders gaining power with the support of global oligarchs. Elon Musk and Donald Trump have both expressed admiration for Milei, seeing him as a kindred spirit who shares their vision of a minimal state and unfettered capitalism.

Musk, in particular, has a vested interest in Argentina due to its vast lithium reserves, which are essential for electric vehicle batteries. By supporting Milei, Musk ensures that Argentina’s resources are available for exploitation at minimal cost. Similarly, Trump’s relationship with Milei reflects a shared ideology of deregulation and corporate favoritism.

6. Milei the Crypto Scammer: Pump and Dump Schemes

Before entering politics, Milei was involved in cryptocurrency schemes that mirrored the “pump and dump” tactics used by figures like Donald Trump. Milei promoted volatile cryptocurrencies to his followers, encouraging them to invest heavily. Once prices surged, he and his associates sold their holdings, leaving his followers with worthless assets.

This pattern of exploiting his followers for personal gain has continued in his political career. Milei’s policies have enriched a small elite while impoverishing the majority of Argentinians.

7. The Stock Market Mirage: A False Measure of Success

The rise in Argentina’s stock market under Milei has been touted as a sign of his success. However, this rise was driven by speculative investments and did not reflect the real economy. While the wealthy benefited from the stock market boom, most Argentinians saw their living standards decline.

8. Extreme Austerity: The Human Cost

Milei’s extreme austerity measures have devastated Argentina’s social services. Cuts to education, healthcare, and social programs have left millions without access to basic services. The reduction in government spending has also led to widespread unemployment and poverty.

9. Brain Drain: The Flight of Talent

The economic instability and lack of opportunities under Milei have triggered a brain drain, as skilled professionals and young people leave Argentina in search of better prospects abroad. This exodus further weakens the country’s economy and future prospects.

10. Social Spending Cuts and the IMF’s Agenda

Milei’s cuts to social spending align perfectly with the IMF’s agenda of shrinking the state and making countries vulnerable to exploitation. By reducing the government’s role, Milei has made Argentina an easy target for foreign corporations and billionaires.

11. Billionaires Sponsoring Milei: Exploitation on a Global Scale

Billionaires like Elon Musk sponsor leaders like Milei to advance their own interests. By promoting deregulation and privatization, they ensure that countries like Argentina remain dependent on foreign capital and resources.

12. Elon Musk’s Similar Actions in the U.S.

Musk’s actions in Argentina mirror his efforts in the United States, where he has advocated for cuts to government jobs and social services. His vision of a minimal state serves the interests of billionaires at the expense of the general population.

Conclusion

Javier Milei’s presidency represents the culmination of a global agenda to exploit nations for the benefit of a few. His rise was engineered by American social media, his policies were dictated by the IMF, and his actions have enriched billionaires like Elon Musk while impoverishing the people of Argentina. The story of Milei’s Argentina is a cautionary tale of how global oligarchs and financial institutions work together to undermine democracy and exploit vulnerable nations.

The global economic landscape has long been dominated by the United States, primarily due to its control over the world’s reserve currency, the US dollar. However, the rise of the BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—presents a significant challenge to this dominance. This article explores how the BRICS can limit the USA’s economic influence, isolate it for decades, and the implications of this shift. Additionally, it delves into the mechanics of the US dollar’s dominance, the trade deficits it creates, and the strategies BRICS can employ to counter this dominance.

The US Dollar’s Dominance: A Double-Edged Sword

The US dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency allows the United States to print money without corresponding real production. This privilege enables the US to finance its trade deficits, as other countries hold dollars as reserves. However, this system also creates vulnerabilities. The US has trade deficits with almost every country, as it imports more than it exports. This imbalance is sustained by the global demand for dollars, but it also undermines the US economy’s long-term stability.

The Secrets of the US Dollar’s Dominance

1. Petrodollar System: The petrodollar system, established in the 1970s, requires oil-exporting countries to sell their oil in US dollars. This ensures a constant demand for dollars, reinforcing their global dominance.
2. Military and Political Influence: The US leverages its military and political power to maintain dollar dominance. Wars, sanctions, and diplomatic pressure are used to ensure that countries continue to use the dollar.
3. Financial Markets: The depth and liquidity of US financial markets attract global investments, further cementing the dollar’s role.

How BRICS Can Limit the USA’s Economic Influence

1. Developing an Alternative Reserve Currency: BRICS can create a new reserve currency or use a basket of currencies to reduce reliance on the US dollar. The Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) could be a starting point.
2. Expanding Bilateral Trade Agreements: BRICS countries can increase trade among themselves using their own currencies, bypassing the dollar. This would reduce the demand for dollars and weaken its dominance.
3. Promoting Regional Financial Institutions: BRICS can strengthen regional financial institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to provide alternative financing options.
4. Diversifying Energy Trade: BRICS can negotiate energy deals using non-dollar currencies, particularly with oil-rich countries. This would undermine the petrodollar system.

The Implications of BRICS’ Hammer on the USA’s Head

1. Economic Isolation: As BRICS reduces reliance on the US dollar, the USA could face economic isolation. This would limit its ability to finance trade deficits and maintain global influence.
2. Weakened Financial Markets: A decline in dollar dominance could lead to reduced demand for US Treasury bonds, affecting the US government’s ability to borrow and potentially leading to higher interest rates.
3. Shift in Global Power Dynamics: The rise of BRICS and the decline of US economic dominance could lead to a multipolar world, with new centers of power emerging. This would reshape global trade, politics, and security dynamics.
4. Increased Instability: The transition from a dollar-centric world to a multipolar financial system could be turbulent, with potential financial crises and geopolitical tensions.

Conclusion

The BRICS nations have the potential to limit the USA’s economic dominance and isolate it for decades by challenging the US dollar’s hegemony. Through the development of alternative reserve currencies, expanding bilateral trade agreements, promoting regional financial institutions, and diversifying energy trade, BRICS can weaken the dollar’s grip on the global economy. The implications of this shift are profound, potentially leading to economic isolation for the USA, weakened financial markets, a shift in global power dynamics, and increased instability during the transition. The era of US economic supremacy may be coming to an end, ushering in a new era of multipolarity.

Social media platforms employ Large Language Models (LLMs) to create misleading comments, captions, data, and other AI-generated content that can influence public opinion. Recently, these platforms have successfully orchestrated manipulations that have incited revolutions in various countries and encouraged individuals to participate in conflicts, including the war between Ukraine and Russia. In this article, we examine the reasons to be cautious about mass comments and the psychological tactics that drive this manipulation. The approach is simple: “Persuade your audience that what you want—while hiding your true intentions—is what the majority (made up of fake accounts and AI bots) are expressing!” This is called social proof technique!

The Art of Manipulation: How Perception Shapes Reality in the Digital Age

In an era dominated by social media and digital communication, the power of influence has taken on new dimensions. One of the most insidious tactics employed by those seeking to manipulate public opinion is the strategy of convincing an audience that their desires align with the majority—while cleverly concealing the true intentions behind this narrative. This phenomenon is often orchestrated through the use of fake accounts and AI bots, creating an illusion of consensus that can sway even the most discerning individuals.

The Mechanics of Manipulation

At its core, this manipulation relies on a psychological principle known as social proof. Humans are inherently social creatures, often looking to the behavior and opinions of others to guide their own decisions. When individuals perceive that a particular viewpoint is widely accepted, they are more likely to adopt that perspective themselves. This is where the manipulation begins.

By flooding social media platforms with comments, likes, and shares from fake accounts and AI-generated content, manipulators can create the illusion of a majority opinion. This orchestrated chorus of voices can make a specific narrative seem not only popular but also credible. The result is a powerful echo chamber that reinforces the desired message, leading real users to believe that they are part of a larger movement.

The Role of AI and Automation

The rise of artificial intelligence has made it easier than ever to execute this strategy. AI tools can generate realistic comments and posts at an unprecedented scale, allowing manipulators to craft a narrative that appears organic. These bots can engage in conversations, respond to queries, and even mimic the language and tone of genuine users, further blurring the lines between reality and fabrication.

Moreover, the anonymity provided by the internet allows these actors to operate without fear of accountability. They can create multiple fake accounts, each contributing to the illusion of a widespread consensus, while their true intentions remain hidden from view.

Psychological Techniques for manipulation

There are several psychological techniques that can be employed to manipulate the minds of the masses. Here are some of the most common ones:

1. Fear Appeals: This technique involves instilling fear to motivate people to act or change their beliefs. By highlighting potential threats or dangers, manipulators can push individuals toward a desired response.
2. Scarcity: Creating a sense of scarcity or urgency can drive people to act quickly. When individuals believe that something is in limited supply or time-sensitive, they may be more likely to make impulsive decisions.
3. Bandwagon Effect: This is a form of social proof where individuals are influenced to adopt a belief or behavior because they perceive that many others are doing the same. The idea is that if everyone else is on board, it must be the right choice.
4. Authority: People are often more likely to follow the advice or directives of someone they perceive as an authority figure. This technique leverages the credibility of experts or influential individuals to sway public opinion.
5. Emotional Appeals: Manipulators may use emotional storytelling or imagery to evoke strong feelings, such as empathy, anger, or joy. These emotions can drive people to support a cause or take action.
6. Cognitive Dissonance: This technique involves creating a sense of discomfort when a person’s beliefs or actions are inconsistent. By highlighting this dissonance, manipulators can encourage individuals to change their beliefs or behaviors to align with the desired outcome.
7. Repetition: Repeated exposure to a message can lead to increased acceptance. The more often people hear or see a particular idea, the more likely they are to believe it.
8. Framing: The way information is presented can significantly influence perception. By framing an issue in a particular light—such as emphasizing positive outcomes or negative consequences—manipulators can shape how people interpret the information.
9. In-group/Out-group Dynamics: This technique involves creating a sense of belonging among a specific group while demonizing or dehumanizing those outside of it. This can foster loyalty and encourage individuals to adopt extreme views or actions in defense of their group.
10. Misinformation and Disinformation: Spreading false or misleading information can create confusion and alter perceptions. This can be used to undermine trust in credible sources and promote a specific agenda.

By understanding these techniques, individuals can become more aware of how their thoughts and behaviors may be influenced and develop critical thinking skills to resist manipulation.

The Consequences of Manipulation

The implications of this manipulation are profound. When individuals are swayed by a fabricated majority, they may find themselves supporting causes or ideologies that they would not have otherwise endorsed. This can lead to real-world consequences, such as political unrest, social division, and even violence, as seen in various global conflicts.

The recent war between Ukraine and Russia serves as a stark example. Social media campaigns have been employed to shape narratives, rally support, and even incite action, all while obscuring the true motivations behind these efforts. The manipulation of public opinion through artificial means can have devastating effects on societies, eroding trust and fostering division.

Recognizing the Tactics

To combat this form of manipulation, it is essential for individuals to develop critical thinking skills and media literacy. Here are some strategies to help recognize and resist these tactics:

1. Question the Consensus: Just because a viewpoint appears to be popular does not mean it is valid. Take the time to research and understand the issue from multiple perspectives.
2. Verify Sources: Look for credible sources of information and be wary of content that lacks transparency. Check the authenticity of accounts and the origins of the information being shared.
3. Engage Thoughtfully: Participate in discussions with a critical mindset. Avoid jumping on bandwagons and instead seek to understand the motivations behind the narratives being presented.
4. Promote Transparency: Advocate for greater transparency in social media algorithms and the use of AI in content generation. Support platforms that prioritize authentic engagement over artificial manipulation.

Conclusion

The strategy of convincing an audience that their desires align with a fabricated majority is a powerful tool in the hands of manipulators. By understanding the mechanics behind this manipulation and developing critical thinking skills, individuals can better navigate the complexities of the digital landscape. In a world where perception often shapes reality, it is crucial to remain vigilant and discerning, ensuring that our beliefs and actions are truly our own.

In the global economic arena, the United States has long held a position of prominence, wielding significant influence and enjoying a resilient economy. Yet, a confluence of underlying trends and structural issues threatens to undermine this stature, potentially leading to a scenario where the US grapples with economic challenges akin to those endured by third-world countries. This article delves into the myriad reasons behind this disheartening possibility and the implications for global economic competition, particularly with China.

1. Escalating Income Inequality

One of the most pressing issues confronting the United States is the ever-widening chasm between the affluent and the impoverished. This economic divide has been intensified by technological advancements, globalization, and policy decisions that skew in favor of the wealthy. As income inequality spirals, the purchasing power of the majority dwindles, eroding the consumer base and stunting economic growth. In stark contrast, China has made substantial strides in alleviating poverty and expanding the middle-class population, thereby fortifying its domestic market and enhancing economic stability.

2. Decaying Infrastructure

The United States’ aging infrastructure is another critical factor that could precipitate its economic decline. Roads, bridges, airports, and public utilities are in dire need of repair and modernization. The neglect of infrastructure not only hampers economic productivity but also poses safety risks. China, by contrast, has invested heavily in infrastructure development, creating a modern and efficient network that supports its economic expansion.

3. Education and Skill Gaps

The United States faces significant challenges in education and workforce development. Budget cuts and underfunding have led to a decline in the quality of public education, particularly in disadvantaged areas. This has resulted in a skills gap that hinders the country’s ability to compete in high-tech industries. China, meanwhile, has prioritized education and has made substantial investments in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education, positioning itself as a global leader in technology and innovation.

4. Political Polarization and Policy Gridlock

Political polarization and gridlock in the United States have led to a lack of coherent and effective economic policies. This political instability creates uncertainty, deterring investment and slowing economic growth. In contrast, China’s centralized political system allows for swift decision-making and implementation of economic policies, giving it a competitive edge in responding to global economic shifts.

5. Debt and Fiscal Imbalance

The United States’ mounting national debt and fiscal imbalance pose significant long-term risks. The country’s reliance on borrowing to fund government operations and stimulate the economy has led to a precarious financial situation. High levels of debt can lead to higher interest rates, reduced fiscal flexibility, and a diminished credit rating, all of which undermine economic stability. China, while also carrying significant debt, has been more proactive in managing its fiscal policies and has maintained a stronger balance sheet relative to its GDP.

6. Globalization and Trade Dynamics

Globalization has reshaped the economic landscape, and the United States’ approach to trade has been a mixed bag. While free trade agreements have opened new markets, they have also led to job losses in certain sectors. The United States’ withdrawal from key trade agreements and its protectionist stance have created uncertainty and strained relationships with trading partners. China, by contrast, has embraced globalization and has become a major player in global trade, leveraging its manufacturing prowess and strategic partnerships to expand its economic influence.

Conclusion

The United States’ economic trajectory is not predetermined, but the convergence of these factors presents a challenging scenario. If left unaddressed, the country could face economic conditions similar to those seen in third-world countries, characterized by high inequality, decaying infrastructure, and a struggling workforce. In this context, China’s strategic investments and cohesive economic policies could propel it to a dominant position in global competition.

To avert this outcome, the United States must undertake comprehensive reforms in education, infrastructure, fiscal policy, and political governance. By addressing these structural issues, the country can strengthen its economic foundation and ensure a competitive edge in the global marketplace. The future of the United States’ economy is not just a matter of domestic concern but also a critical factor in shaping the global economic order.

Inflation, the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services rises, is a critical economic indicator that affects the purchasing power of consumers and the stability of economies. Historically, moderate inflation has been considered healthy for economic growth, but high inflation can lead to economic instability and hardship. In recent years, the European Union (EU) and the United States (USA) have experienced varying levels of inflation, but some economists and analysts are predicting a significant surge in inflation rates, potentially reaching a minimum of 35% by 2026. At great ICDST tech center, we have analyzed extensive time series data using cutting-edge AI technologies to determine the minimum true inflation rates for the EU and the USA. This article explores the factors that could contribute to such a dramatic increase in inflation.

1. Supply Chain Disruptions

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global supply chains, leading to shortages of essential goods and materials. As economies began to recover, demand for goods surged, but supply chains struggled to keep up. This imbalance has led to higher prices for raw materials, components, and finished products. If these disruptions persist or worsen, the cost of goods and services could continue to rise, contributing to a significant increase in inflation.

2. Energy Prices

Energy prices, particularly for oil and natural gas, have a direct impact on the cost of production and transportation. Geopolitical tensions, such as those involving Russia and Ukraine, have already led to spikes in energy prices. If these tensions escalate or if there are further disruptions in energy production and distribution, the cost of energy could skyrocket, driving up the prices of goods and services across the board.

3. Monetary Policy

Central banks in the EU and USA have responded to the economic impact of the pandemic by implementing expansive monetary policies, including low interest rates and large-scale asset purchases. While these measures have helped to stimulate economic recovery, they have also increased the money supply, potentially leading to higher inflation. If central banks are slow to tighten monetary policy, the risk of inflation spiraling out of control could increase.

4. Fiscal Stimulus

Governments in the EU and USA have implemented significant fiscal stimulus measures to support their economies during the pandemic. These measures, including direct payments to individuals and businesses, have increased demand for goods and services. However, if this increased demand outpaces supply, it could lead to higher prices and contribute to inflation.

5. Labor Market Tightness

The labor market has been tight in both the EU and USA, with unemployment rates falling as economies recover. As businesses compete for a limited pool of workers, wages have been rising. Higher wages increase the cost of production, which can be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. If this wage-price spiral continues, it could contribute to a significant increase in inflation.

6. Inflation Expectations

Inflation expectations play a crucial role in determining actual inflation rates. If businesses and consumers expect inflation to rise, they may demand higher wages and prices, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If inflation expectations become entrenched, it could lead to a sustained period of high inflation.

7. Global Economic Shocks

Global economic shocks, such as trade wars, geopolitical conflicts, or natural disasters, can have a significant impact on inflation. These shocks can disrupt trade, increase uncertainty, and lead to higher prices for goods and services. If multiple shocks occur simultaneously, the cumulative effect could push inflation rates to unprecedented levels.

8. Debt Levels

High levels of government and corporate debt can also contribute to inflation. As governments and businesses seek to service their debts, they may resort to inflationary policies, such as printing money or increasing borrowing, which can lead to higher prices. If debt levels continue to rise, the pressure to inflate away the debt could become overwhelming.

Conclusion

While predicting inflation with certainty is challenging, the confluence of these factors suggests that the EU and USA could face a significant increase in inflation rates by 2026. Supply chain disruptions, energy price volatility, expansive monetary and fiscal policies, labor market tightness, entrenched inflation expectations, global economic shocks, and high debt levels all contribute to the potential for inflation to reach at least 35%. Policymakers and central banks will need to carefully monitor these trends and take proactive measures to mitigate the risks of runaway inflation and ensure economic stability.

With its 7 nm engraving, the Chinese smelter SMIC foiled many predictions that saw the impossible or at least the unviable minimum. For example, the company’s foundries released the HiSilicon Kirin 9000S SoCs in 7 nm in 2023 and then Kirin 9010 in 2024, which equip Huawei smartphones, which are certainly sold at high prices but are very successful and show that this is not only possible but also viable, in part it must also be said thanks to the Chinese government’s help that does not skil the money in subsidies.

It is recalled that to etch in 7 nm, Chinese farmers have no choice but to use the DUV (Deep Ultra Violet) technology to engrave its chips, not having access to the USV (Extreme Ultra Violet) lithography of the firm ASML. The result is etching both longer and with a much higher initial failure rate in DUV. As you will have understood, much more expensive production, more than four times more expensive puts some analysts, even if things then improve a little over time, as the rate of chess falls. We can better understand why Huawei smartphones with HiSilicon chips are so expensive despite performances that are not revolutionary.

The rumor of the day comes from the Business Korea website, which reports that the 5 nm will now be ready at SMIC. Yes, yes, 5 nm. So obviously ‘loan’ does not mean ‘viable’ and whatever the information happens is to be taken with tweezers, but the founder would work hard, no doubt again being subsidies to help him, to make it commercially exploitable as quickly as possible according to the noises of corridors, whereas the DUV would obviously still be required.

This would make sense at any rate while other rumors in recent weeks are talking about the future Huawei Mate 70 smartphone series, expected by the end of 2024 and which would bring a nice performance gain compared to the current Huawei Mate 60 and Huawei Pura 70 in Kirin 9010 or 9000S. Is the switch to 5 nm one of the reasons?

Chinese tech giant Huawei has made significant progress in developing its own central processing unit (CPU) cores, a key component of various computing devices. This has made sanctions on this company look useless and inefficient which is a signal to many companies around the world to reduce reliance on US companies. Although they are not yet at the absolute forefront, benchmarks indicate that their performance has reached the level of that of the main competitors of a few years ago, suggesting that they can adequately serve a large portion of the market.

A recent benchmark test, reported by US magazine Tom’s Hardware, evaluated the performance of Huawei’s Taishan V120 core, one of its own models. The Taishan V120’s single-core performance matched that of AMD’s Zen 3 cores, released in 2020. This means that although Huawei is still at the forefront of CPU technology, the gap has narrowed significantly. The performance of the Taishan V120 is generally sufficient for most mainstream applications on the market.

This tested core is part of the new Kirin 9000 System on Chip (SOC). It integrates four Taishan V120 cores alongside two Cortex A510 ARM cores to efficiently handle less demanding tasks. The Kirin 9000 itself uses a second-generation 7-nanometer manufacturing process at contract manufacturer SMIC.

However, the exact chip tested in the benchmark remains unclear. The test bears the label “Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova”. This suggests it could be a Kunpeng server processor, potentially the Kunpeng 930. This chip was originally official before US sanctions against Huawei took effect. Initially, there was a plan for 5-nanometer production by TSMC and a 2021 launch schedule. However, these plans were disrupted, forcing Huawei to use the processor with alternative arrangements, leading to the current delay.

Overall, Huawei’s progress in CPU development demonstrates its ability to adapt and partially compensate for the limitations imposed by the US embargo. Although they have not yet reached the absolute next level, their improvements bring their offerings closer to meeting the demands of the mainstream market. It remains to be seen how quickly they can close the remaining gap and potentially compete for the top spot in the future.