The post-World War II era saw the rise of two superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, whose imperial ambitions shaped the global order for decades. However, as the 21st century unfolds, both nations are struggling to maintain their former glory. The United States, once the self-called leader of the free world (!), and Russia, the inheritor of the Soviet legacy, are now shadows of their former selves. Their attempts to reclaim their imperial past are not only futile but also highlight their declining relevance in a world increasingly dominated by China. The sum of their efforts is zero, as both nations fail to adapt to a new global reality where economic power, technological innovation, and multilateral cooperation define success.

The Futility of U.S. Control Over the Panama Canal to Influence China

One of the most glaring examples of the United States’ declining influence is its attempt to control the Panama Canal as a tool to counter China’s growing global presence. The Panama Canal, a critical maritime route, has long been a symbol of U.S. geopolitical power. However, using it as a lever to influence China is a strategy rooted in outdated thinking. China, now the world’s largest trading nation, has diversified its supply chains and invested heavily in alternative routes, such as the Belt and Road Initiative. The U.S. strategy is not only ineffective but also highlights its inability to compete economically with China.

Moreover, the United States is increasingly seen as a destabilizing force in global affairs. Its reliance on military interventions, sanctions, and covert operations has earned it the label of a “terrorist state” in the eyes of many nations. Unlike China, which focuses on infrastructure development and economic partnerships, the U.S. struggles to produce goods that can compete in the global market. Its manufacturing base has eroded, and its economy is overly reliant on financial services and military exports. This lack of productive capacity undermines its ability to wield economic influence, rendering its attempts to control strategic chokepoints like the Panama Canal meaningless.

China’s Technological Dominance vs. U.S. Decline

While the United States struggles to maintain its technological edge, China has emerged as a global leader in high-tech industries. China now produces cutting-edge CPUs, semiconductors, and other advanced technologies that are essential for the modern economy. In contrast, the U.S. has fallen behind in even basic manufacturing capabilities. For instance, the U.S. is no longer able to produce simple components like CPU fans, relying instead on imports from China and other countries. This technological dependence is a stark reminder of how far the U.S. has fallen from its post-war industrial peak.

China’s focus on innovation and self-reliance has paid off, allowing it to dominate key sectors of the global economy. The U.S., on the other hand, has prioritized short-term profits and military spending over long-term investments in research and development. As a result, it is losing the technological race to China, further diminishing its global influence.

The Decline of the USD and the Failure of U.S. Economic Policies

The decline of the U.S. dollar (USD) is another indicator of America’s waning power. Both the Biden and Trump administrations have overseen significant declines in the dollar’s value relative to gold, reflecting broader economic weaknesses. Trump’s tenure, marked by right-wing populism and divisive rhetoric, failed to deliver meaningful economic benefits for the majority of Americans. His policies, often characterized as political theater, did little to address the structural issues plaguing the U.S. economy, such as income inequality, declining manufacturing, and an overreliance on debt.

Similarly, the Biden administration has struggled to reverse these trends. While it has attempted to implement more progressive policies, the underlying challenges remain unresolved. The U.S. economy continues to underperform, and the dollar’s decline signals a loss of confidence in America’s ability to maintain its global leadership.

China’s Economic Dominance and the Opportunity for the EU

China now produces over 50% of the world’s goods, making it the undisputed leader in global manufacturing. Its economic rise has created new opportunities for nations willing to embrace multilateral cooperation. For the European Union (EU), this is the perfect time to strengthen ties with China. The U.S. and Russia, locked in a zero-sum alliance that benefits neither, are no longer reliable partners for the EU. By aligning with China, the EU can tap into a dynamic and growing economy, ensuring its own prosperity in a rapidly changing world.

The U.S. and Russia’s attempts to cling to their imperial past are doomed to fail. Their combined efforts amount to zero, as they lack the economic, technological, and moral authority to shape the future. In contrast, China’s rise offers a new model of global leadership based on mutual benefit and cooperation. For the EU and other nations, the choice is clear: embrace the future with China or remain tethered to the fading dreams of a bygone era.

Finally, the sum of two zeros is indeed zero! The U.S. and Russia’s efforts to reclaim their imperial glory are futile in a world where economic power and technological innovation define success. China’s rise presents an opportunity for nations to forge a new path, one that prioritizes cooperation over conflict and progress over nostalgia. The time has come for the world to move beyond the outdated ambitions of the past and embrace a future shaped by shared prosperity and mutual respect.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of global technology, the semiconductor industry stands as a critical pillar, influencing everything from consumer electronics to national security. Over the past decade, China has been steadily advancing its capabilities in chip and integrated circuit (IC) production, positioning itself as a formidable competitor against traditional leaders like the United States. This article explores China’s strategic moves in the semiconductor sector, highlighting key companies and developments that underscore its growing supremacy in this critical field.

Strategic Investments and Policy Support

China’s rise in the semiconductor industry is underpinned by significant government support and strategic investments. The “Made in China 2025” initiative, launched in 2015, prioritizes the development of high-tech industries, including semiconductors, aiming to reduce dependence on foreign technology and enhance domestic capabilities. This policy framework has facilitated substantial funding and incentives for domestic chipmakers, accelerating their growth and innovation.

Leading Chinese Semiconductor Companies

Several Chinese companies have emerged as key players in the global semiconductor market, challenging established U.S. firms. Here are a few notable examples:

1. SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation) – As China’s largest and most advanced semiconductor foundry, SMIC has been rapidly expanding its production capabilities. Despite facing export restrictions from the U.S., SMIC continues to invest in advanced manufacturing technologies, aiming to close the gap with global leaders like TSMC and Samsung.
2. Huawei’s HiSilicon – Although primarily known for its telecommunications equipment, Huawei’s subsidiary HiSilicon has made significant strides in designing high-end chips for smartphones and networking equipment. The Kirin series of processors, used in Huawei smartphones, is a testament to HiSilicon’s design capabilities.
3. Unigroup ZYMEC – Specializing in memory chips, Unigroup ZYMEC has been expanding its production capacity to meet the growing demand for NAND flash and DRAM chips. The company’s aggressive expansion plans are part of China’s broader strategy to reduce reliance on foreign memory chip suppliers.

Challenges for the U.S. Semiconductor Industry

The U.S. semiconductor industry, once the undisputed leader, faces several challenges in maintaining its dominance. Key issues include:

• Geopolitical Tensions – Ongoing trade disputes and geopolitical tensions have led to increased scrutiny and restrictions on technology exports to China, potentially limiting U.S. companies’ access to one of the world’s largest markets.
• Competition from Chinese Firms – As Chinese companies continue to improve their technological capabilities and receive substantial government support, they are becoming increasingly competitive, posing a significant challenge to U.S. firms.
• Investment Disparity – The level of investment in China’s semiconductor industry far exceeds that of many U.S. firms, allowing Chinese companies to rapidly scale up and innovate.

China’s ascendancy in the chip and IC production sector is reshaping the global semiconductor landscape. With strategic investments, supportive policies, and the rise of domestic champions, China is not only enhancing its self-sufficiency but also challenging the traditional dominance of U.S. firms. As the competition intensifies, it remains to be seen how the U.S. will respond to these challenges and whether it can regain its footing in this critical sector. However, one thing is clear: the “chip battle” is far from over, and the next few years will be pivotal in determining the future of global semiconductor leadership.

The global economic landscape has long been dominated by the United States, primarily due to its control over the world’s reserve currency, the US dollar. However, the rise of the BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—presents a significant challenge to this dominance. This article explores how the BRICS can limit the USA’s economic influence, isolate it for decades, and the implications of this shift. Additionally, it delves into the mechanics of the US dollar’s dominance, the trade deficits it creates, and the strategies BRICS can employ to counter this dominance.

The US Dollar’s Dominance: A Double-Edged Sword

The US dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency allows the United States to print money without corresponding real production. This privilege enables the US to finance its trade deficits, as other countries hold dollars as reserves. However, this system also creates vulnerabilities. The US has trade deficits with almost every country, as it imports more than it exports. This imbalance is sustained by the global demand for dollars, but it also undermines the US economy’s long-term stability.

The Secrets of the US Dollar’s Dominance

1. Petrodollar System: The petrodollar system, established in the 1970s, requires oil-exporting countries to sell their oil in US dollars. This ensures a constant demand for dollars, reinforcing their global dominance.
2. Military and Political Influence: The US leverages its military and political power to maintain dollar dominance. Wars, sanctions, and diplomatic pressure are used to ensure that countries continue to use the dollar.
3. Financial Markets: The depth and liquidity of US financial markets attract global investments, further cementing the dollar’s role.

How BRICS Can Limit the USA’s Economic Influence

1. Developing an Alternative Reserve Currency: BRICS can create a new reserve currency or use a basket of currencies to reduce reliance on the US dollar. The Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) could be a starting point.
2. Expanding Bilateral Trade Agreements: BRICS countries can increase trade among themselves using their own currencies, bypassing the dollar. This would reduce the demand for dollars and weaken its dominance.
3. Promoting Regional Financial Institutions: BRICS can strengthen regional financial institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to provide alternative financing options.
4. Diversifying Energy Trade: BRICS can negotiate energy deals using non-dollar currencies, particularly with oil-rich countries. This would undermine the petrodollar system.

The Implications of BRICS’ Hammer on the USA’s Head

1. Economic Isolation: As BRICS reduces reliance on the US dollar, the USA could face economic isolation. This would limit its ability to finance trade deficits and maintain global influence.
2. Weakened Financial Markets: A decline in dollar dominance could lead to reduced demand for US Treasury bonds, affecting the US government’s ability to borrow and potentially leading to higher interest rates.
3. Shift in Global Power Dynamics: The rise of BRICS and the decline of US economic dominance could lead to a multipolar world, with new centers of power emerging. This would reshape global trade, politics, and security dynamics.
4. Increased Instability: The transition from a dollar-centric world to a multipolar financial system could be turbulent, with potential financial crises and geopolitical tensions.

Conclusion

The BRICS nations have the potential to limit the USA’s economic dominance and isolate it for decades by challenging the US dollar’s hegemony. Through the development of alternative reserve currencies, expanding bilateral trade agreements, promoting regional financial institutions, and diversifying energy trade, BRICS can weaken the dollar’s grip on the global economy. The implications of this shift are profound, potentially leading to economic isolation for the USA, weakened financial markets, a shift in global power dynamics, and increased instability during the transition. The era of US economic supremacy may be coming to an end, ushering in a new era of multipolarity.

In the global economic arena, the United States has long held a position of prominence, wielding significant influence and enjoying a resilient economy. Yet, a confluence of underlying trends and structural issues threatens to undermine this stature, potentially leading to a scenario where the US grapples with economic challenges akin to those endured by third-world countries. This article delves into the myriad reasons behind this disheartening possibility and the implications for global economic competition, particularly with China.

1. Escalating Income Inequality

One of the most pressing issues confronting the United States is the ever-widening chasm between the affluent and the impoverished. This economic divide has been intensified by technological advancements, globalization, and policy decisions that skew in favor of the wealthy. As income inequality spirals, the purchasing power of the majority dwindles, eroding the consumer base and stunting economic growth. In stark contrast, China has made substantial strides in alleviating poverty and expanding the middle-class population, thereby fortifying its domestic market and enhancing economic stability.

2. Decaying Infrastructure

The United States’ aging infrastructure is another critical factor that could precipitate its economic decline. Roads, bridges, airports, and public utilities are in dire need of repair and modernization. The neglect of infrastructure not only hampers economic productivity but also poses safety risks. China, by contrast, has invested heavily in infrastructure development, creating a modern and efficient network that supports its economic expansion.

3. Education and Skill Gaps

The United States faces significant challenges in education and workforce development. Budget cuts and underfunding have led to a decline in the quality of public education, particularly in disadvantaged areas. This has resulted in a skills gap that hinders the country’s ability to compete in high-tech industries. China, meanwhile, has prioritized education and has made substantial investments in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education, positioning itself as a global leader in technology and innovation.

4. Political Polarization and Policy Gridlock

Political polarization and gridlock in the United States have led to a lack of coherent and effective economic policies. This political instability creates uncertainty, deterring investment and slowing economic growth. In contrast, China’s centralized political system allows for swift decision-making and implementation of economic policies, giving it a competitive edge in responding to global economic shifts.

5. Debt and Fiscal Imbalance

The United States’ mounting national debt and fiscal imbalance pose significant long-term risks. The country’s reliance on borrowing to fund government operations and stimulate the economy has led to a precarious financial situation. High levels of debt can lead to higher interest rates, reduced fiscal flexibility, and a diminished credit rating, all of which undermine economic stability. China, while also carrying significant debt, has been more proactive in managing its fiscal policies and has maintained a stronger balance sheet relative to its GDP.

6. Globalization and Trade Dynamics

Globalization has reshaped the economic landscape, and the United States’ approach to trade has been a mixed bag. While free trade agreements have opened new markets, they have also led to job losses in certain sectors. The United States’ withdrawal from key trade agreements and its protectionist stance have created uncertainty and strained relationships with trading partners. China, by contrast, has embraced globalization and has become a major player in global trade, leveraging its manufacturing prowess and strategic partnerships to expand its economic influence.

Conclusion

The United States’ economic trajectory is not predetermined, but the convergence of these factors presents a challenging scenario. If left unaddressed, the country could face economic conditions similar to those seen in third-world countries, characterized by high inequality, decaying infrastructure, and a struggling workforce. In this context, China’s strategic investments and cohesive economic policies could propel it to a dominant position in global competition.

To avert this outcome, the United States must undertake comprehensive reforms in education, infrastructure, fiscal policy, and political governance. By addressing these structural issues, the country can strengthen its economic foundation and ensure a competitive edge in the global marketplace. The future of the United States’ economy is not just a matter of domestic concern but also a critical factor in shaping the global economic order.

Elon Musk recently remarked, “Thanks to social proof and the IMF debt strategies, we now own Argentina!” This statement underscores the significant influence of economic strategies in shaping geopolitical landscapes, particularly in light of Javier Milei’s election as Argentina’s president in 2023. Milei, a self-proclaimed libertarian and anarcho-capitalist, gained traction with promises to dismantle the state, dollarize the economy, and combat chronic inflation. However, his rise to power is intertwined with American social media manipulation and corporate interests, raising concerns about the exploitative policies of institutions like the IMF. This situation reflects a broader agenda among global oligarchs, including figures like Musk and Donald Trump, who may benefit from Milei’s presidency while exacerbating Argentina’s economic challenges. The intersection of these dynamics highlights the complex relationship between political power, corporate influence, and the strategies employed to control national resources.

1. American Social Media and the Technique of Social Proof

Javier Milei’s rise to power was significantly aided by American social media platforms and the psychological technique of “social proof.” Social proof is a phenomenon where people mimic the actions of others in an attempt to reflect correct behavior in a given situation. In Milei’s case, his campaign leveraged platforms like Twitter (now X), Facebook, and YouTube to create an illusion of widespread support and inevitability.

American consultants and algorithms amplified Milei’s message, portraying him as a maverick outsider who could save Argentina from its economic crisis. His eccentric personality, complete with wild hair and chainsaw-wielding antics, made him a viral sensation. This online persona was carefully crafted to appeal to a global audience, particularly libertarians and far-right groups in the United States. By creating a sense of momentum and inevitability, Milei’s campaign used social proof to convince Argentinians that he was the only solution to their problems.

This strategy was not merely organic; it was backed by powerful interests. American corporations and billionaires saw Milei as a tool to open Argentina’s markets to foreign exploitation. His promises to deregulate industries, privatize state assets, and align Argentina closely with the United States made him an attractive candidate for those seeking to expand their influence in South America.

2. Manipulating Public Perception: Turning Price Surges Into Political Wins

Upon taking office, Milei implemented aggressive free-market reforms aimed at stabilizing Argentina’s volatile economy. However, these measures initially led to a sharp surge in prices, exacerbating inflationary pressures already present in the country. Rather than addressing this crisis transparently, Milei’s administration worked closely with sympathetic media outlets to frame the price hikes as necessary short-term sacrifices paving the way for long-term prosperity.

Over time, as inflation began to stabilize slightly, Milei’s team declared it a monumental achievement, using carefully curated statistics and selective reporting to paint a rosy picture of economic recovery. This narrative manipulation relied heavily on controlling public discourse via social media, where supporters amplified positive headlines while dismissing dissenting voices.

Yet, beneath the surface, ordinary Argentinians continued to struggle with rising living costs and dwindled purchasing power. The disconnect between official narratives and lived realities highlights the dangers of allowing politically motivated spin to overshadow objective analysis.

3. The IMF’s Role in Argentina’s Deindustrialization and Debt Trap

Argentina’s economic woes are deeply intertwined with the policies of the IMF. For decades, the IMF has imposed austerity measures and structural adjustment programs on Argentina, forcing the country to prioritize debt repayment over social spending. These policies have led to deindustrialization, as local industries were unable to compete with cheap imports and foreign corporations.

Milei’s presidency has accelerated this process. By adhering to IMF demands, he has further weakened Argentina’s economy, making it easier for foreign corporations and billionaires to exploit the country’s resources. The IMF’s unpayable loans have trapped Argentina in a cycle of debt, ensuring that the country remains dependent on foreign capital.

4. Alberto Fernández’s Warnings: The Unpayable Debt Trap

Former President Alberto Fernández was acutely aware of the dangers posed by IMF loans. He resisted taking on additional debt, arguing that the conditions attached to these loans would only deepen Argentina’s economic crisis. Fernández understood that the IMF’s true goal was not to help Argentina but to create a debt trap that would force the country to privatize its assets and open its markets to foreign exploitation.

Milei’s decision to embrace the IMF’s agenda has proven Fernández right. The unpayable debts have left Argentina impoverished, with its resources and industries now vulnerable to exploitation by foreign corporations.

5. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and Their Ties to Milei

Javier Milei’s rise was not an isolated event; it was part of a broader trend of far-right, libertarian leaders gaining power with the support of global oligarchs. Elon Musk and Donald Trump have both expressed admiration for Milei, seeing him as a kindred spirit who shares their vision of a minimal state and unfettered capitalism.

Musk, in particular, has a vested interest in Argentina due to its vast lithium reserves, which are essential for electric vehicle batteries. By supporting Milei, Musk ensures that Argentina’s resources are available for exploitation at minimal cost. Similarly, Trump’s relationship with Milei reflects a shared ideology of deregulation and corporate favoritism.

6. Milei the Crypto Scammer: Pump and Dump Schemes

Before entering politics, Milei was involved in cryptocurrency schemes that mirrored the “pump and dump” tactics used by figures like Donald Trump. Milei promoted volatile cryptocurrencies to his followers, encouraging them to invest heavily. Once prices surged, he and his associates sold their holdings, leaving his followers with worthless assets.

This pattern of exploiting his followers for personal gain has continued in his political career. Milei’s policies have enriched a small elite while impoverishing the majority of Argentinians.

7. The Stock Market Mirage: A False Measure of Success

The rise in Argentina’s stock market under Milei has been touted as a sign of his success. However, this rise was driven by speculative investments and did not reflect the real economy. While the wealthy benefited from the stock market boom, most Argentinians saw their living standards decline.

8. Extreme Austerity: The Human Cost

Milei’s extreme austerity measures have devastated Argentina’s social services. Cuts to education, healthcare, and social programs have left millions without access to basic services. The reduction in government spending has also led to widespread unemployment and poverty.

9. Brain Drain: The Flight of Talent

The economic instability and lack of opportunities under Milei have triggered a brain drain, as skilled professionals and young people leave Argentina in search of better prospects abroad. This exodus further weakens the country’s economy and future prospects.

10. Social Spending Cuts and the IMF’s Agenda

Milei’s cuts to social spending align perfectly with the IMF’s agenda of shrinking the state and making countries vulnerable to exploitation. By reducing the government’s role, Milei has made Argentina an easy target for foreign corporations and billionaires.

11. Billionaires Sponsoring Milei: Exploitation on a Global Scale

Billionaires like Elon Musk sponsor leaders like Milei to advance their own interests. By promoting deregulation and privatization, they ensure that countries like Argentina remain dependent on foreign capital and resources.

12. Elon Musk’s Similar Actions in the U.S.

Musk’s actions in Argentina mirror his efforts in the United States, where he has advocated for cuts to government jobs and social services. His vision of a minimal state serves the interests of billionaires at the expense of the general population.

Conclusion

Javier Milei’s presidency represents the culmination of a global agenda to exploit nations for the benefit of a few. His rise was engineered by American social media, his policies were dictated by the IMF, and his actions have enriched billionaires like Elon Musk while impoverishing the people of Argentina. The story of Milei’s Argentina is a cautionary tale of how global oligarchs and financial institutions work together to undermine democracy and exploit vulnerable nations.

Chinese tech giant Huawei has made significant progress in developing its own central processing unit (CPU) cores, a key component of various computing devices. This has made sanctions on this company look useless and inefficient which is a signal to many companies around the world to reduce reliance on US companies. Although they are not yet at the absolute forefront, benchmarks indicate that their performance has reached the level of that of the main competitors of a few years ago, suggesting that they can adequately serve a large portion of the market.

A recent benchmark test, reported by US magazine Tom’s Hardware, evaluated the performance of Huawei’s Taishan V120 core, one of its own models. The Taishan V120’s single-core performance matched that of AMD’s Zen 3 cores, released in 2020. This means that although Huawei is still at the forefront of CPU technology, the gap has narrowed significantly. The performance of the Taishan V120 is generally sufficient for most mainstream applications on the market.

This tested core is part of the new Kirin 9000 System on Chip (SOC). It integrates four Taishan V120 cores alongside two Cortex A510 ARM cores to efficiently handle less demanding tasks. The Kirin 9000 itself uses a second-generation 7-nanometer manufacturing process at contract manufacturer SMIC.

However, the exact chip tested in the benchmark remains unclear. The test bears the label “Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova”. This suggests it could be a Kunpeng server processor, potentially the Kunpeng 930. This chip was originally official before US sanctions against Huawei took effect. Initially, there was a plan for 5-nanometer production by TSMC and a 2021 launch schedule. However, these plans were disrupted, forcing Huawei to use the processor with alternative arrangements, leading to the current delay.

Overall, Huawei’s progress in CPU development demonstrates its ability to adapt and partially compensate for the limitations imposed by the US embargo. Although they have not yet reached the absolute next level, their improvements bring their offerings closer to meeting the demands of the mainstream market. It remains to be seen how quickly they can close the remaining gap and potentially compete for the top spot in the future.

Social media platforms employ Large Language Models (LLMs) to create misleading comments, captions, data, and other AI-generated content that can influence public opinion. Recently, these platforms have successfully orchestrated manipulations that have incited revolutions in various countries and encouraged individuals to participate in conflicts, including the war between Ukraine and Russia. In this article, we examine the reasons to be cautious about mass comments and the psychological tactics that drive this manipulation. The approach is simple: “Persuade your audience that what you want—while hiding your true intentions—is what the majority (made up of fake accounts and AI bots) are expressing!” This is called social proof technique!

The Art of Manipulation: How Perception Shapes Reality in the Digital Age

In an era dominated by social media and digital communication, the power of influence has taken on new dimensions. One of the most insidious tactics employed by those seeking to manipulate public opinion is the strategy of convincing an audience that their desires align with the majority—while cleverly concealing the true intentions behind this narrative. This phenomenon is often orchestrated through the use of fake accounts and AI bots, creating an illusion of consensus that can sway even the most discerning individuals.

The Mechanics of Manipulation

At its core, this manipulation relies on a psychological principle known as social proof. Humans are inherently social creatures, often looking to the behavior and opinions of others to guide their own decisions. When individuals perceive that a particular viewpoint is widely accepted, they are more likely to adopt that perspective themselves. This is where the manipulation begins.

By flooding social media platforms with comments, likes, and shares from fake accounts and AI-generated content, manipulators can create the illusion of a majority opinion. This orchestrated chorus of voices can make a specific narrative seem not only popular but also credible. The result is a powerful echo chamber that reinforces the desired message, leading real users to believe that they are part of a larger movement.

The Role of AI and Automation

The rise of artificial intelligence has made it easier than ever to execute this strategy. AI tools can generate realistic comments and posts at an unprecedented scale, allowing manipulators to craft a narrative that appears organic. These bots can engage in conversations, respond to queries, and even mimic the language and tone of genuine users, further blurring the lines between reality and fabrication.

Moreover, the anonymity provided by the internet allows these actors to operate without fear of accountability. They can create multiple fake accounts, each contributing to the illusion of a widespread consensus, while their true intentions remain hidden from view.

Psychological Techniques for manipulation

There are several psychological techniques that can be employed to manipulate the minds of the masses. Here are some of the most common ones:

1. Fear Appeals: This technique involves instilling fear to motivate people to act or change their beliefs. By highlighting potential threats or dangers, manipulators can push individuals toward a desired response.
2. Scarcity: Creating a sense of scarcity or urgency can drive people to act quickly. When individuals believe that something is in limited supply or time-sensitive, they may be more likely to make impulsive decisions.
3. Bandwagon Effect: This is a form of social proof where individuals are influenced to adopt a belief or behavior because they perceive that many others are doing the same. The idea is that if everyone else is on board, it must be the right choice.
4. Authority: People are often more likely to follow the advice or directives of someone they perceive as an authority figure. This technique leverages the credibility of experts or influential individuals to sway public opinion.
5. Emotional Appeals: Manipulators may use emotional storytelling or imagery to evoke strong feelings, such as empathy, anger, or joy. These emotions can drive people to support a cause or take action.
6. Cognitive Dissonance: This technique involves creating a sense of discomfort when a person’s beliefs or actions are inconsistent. By highlighting this dissonance, manipulators can encourage individuals to change their beliefs or behaviors to align with the desired outcome.
7. Repetition: Repeated exposure to a message can lead to increased acceptance. The more often people hear or see a particular idea, the more likely they are to believe it.
8. Framing: The way information is presented can significantly influence perception. By framing an issue in a particular light—such as emphasizing positive outcomes or negative consequences—manipulators can shape how people interpret the information.
9. In-group/Out-group Dynamics: This technique involves creating a sense of belonging among a specific group while demonizing or dehumanizing those outside of it. This can foster loyalty and encourage individuals to adopt extreme views or actions in defense of their group.
10. Misinformation and Disinformation: Spreading false or misleading information can create confusion and alter perceptions. This can be used to undermine trust in credible sources and promote a specific agenda.

By understanding these techniques, individuals can become more aware of how their thoughts and behaviors may be influenced and develop critical thinking skills to resist manipulation.

The Consequences of Manipulation

The implications of this manipulation are profound. When individuals are swayed by a fabricated majority, they may find themselves supporting causes or ideologies that they would not have otherwise endorsed. This can lead to real-world consequences, such as political unrest, social division, and even violence, as seen in various global conflicts.

The recent war between Ukraine and Russia serves as a stark example. Social media campaigns have been employed to shape narratives, rally support, and even incite action, all while obscuring the true motivations behind these efforts. The manipulation of public opinion through artificial means can have devastating effects on societies, eroding trust and fostering division.

Recognizing the Tactics

To combat this form of manipulation, it is essential for individuals to develop critical thinking skills and media literacy. Here are some strategies to help recognize and resist these tactics:

1. Question the Consensus: Just because a viewpoint appears to be popular does not mean it is valid. Take the time to research and understand the issue from multiple perspectives.
2. Verify Sources: Look for credible sources of information and be wary of content that lacks transparency. Check the authenticity of accounts and the origins of the information being shared.
3. Engage Thoughtfully: Participate in discussions with a critical mindset. Avoid jumping on bandwagons and instead seek to understand the motivations behind the narratives being presented.
4. Promote Transparency: Advocate for greater transparency in social media algorithms and the use of AI in content generation. Support platforms that prioritize authentic engagement over artificial manipulation.

Conclusion

The strategy of convincing an audience that their desires align with a fabricated majority is a powerful tool in the hands of manipulators. By understanding the mechanics behind this manipulation and developing critical thinking skills, individuals can better navigate the complexities of the digital landscape. In a world where perception often shapes reality, it is crucial to remain vigilant and discerning, ensuring that our beliefs and actions are truly our own.

As the world becomes increasingly captivated by the potential of artificial intelligence (AI), a new narrative is emerging—one that raises critical questions about the true motivations behind the AI race. What if this race is not merely about technological advancement and innovation, but rather a strategic effort to consume the energy resources of nations while profiting from the sale of specialized hardware, much like the crypto mining boom? This perspective invites us to reconsider the implications of our relentless pursuit of AI and the energy-intensive infrastructures that support it.

The Energy Consumption Dilemma

At the core of the AI revolution lies an insatiable demand for computational power. Training sophisticated AI models requires vast amounts of energy, primarily supplied by data centers filled with specialized hardware such as graphics processing units (GPUs) and tensor processing units (TPUs). As companies and nations invest heavily in AI capabilities, the energy consumption associated with these technologies has skyrocketed, leading to concerns about sustainability and resource allocation.

In this context, one must ask: are we inadvertently fueling a system that prioritizes the consumption of national energy resources for the benefit of a few powerful corporations? The parallels to crypto mining are striking. Just as crypto miners consume vast amounts of electricity to validate transactions and earn digital currency, AI companies are building infrastructures that drain energy from national grids, often without a corresponding benefit to the public.

The Hardware Profit Motive

The companies that manufacture and sell the hardware necessary for AI development stand to gain immensely from this energy-intensive race. Much like the crypto mining industry, which has created a lucrative market for specialized mining rigs, the AI sector is witnessing a surge in demand for high-performance computing hardware. Companies like NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel are reaping the rewards, with their stock prices soaring as nations and corporations scramble to acquire the latest technology.

This dynamic raises important questions about the motivations behind the AI race. Are we witnessing a genuine pursuit of innovation, or is it a calculated effort by hardware manufacturers to capitalize on the energy resources of nations? The potential for profit in this scenario is enormous, and the implications for energy consumption and sustainability are profound.

The Illusion of Progress

The narrative surrounding AI often emphasizes its potential to drive economic growth, improve efficiency, and solve complex problems. However, this narrative can obscure the reality that the energy-intensive nature of AI development may not yield the societal benefits that were initially envisioned. Instead, nations may find themselves locked in a cycle of dependency on energy-intensive technologies that do not necessarily translate into tangible improvements in quality of life.

Moreover, the focus on AI can divert attention and resources away from more sustainable and equitable development strategies. Instead of investing in renewable energy, education, and healthcare, countries may prioritize AI infrastructure, ultimately sacrificing their long-term well-being for short-term gains.

A Call for Sustainable Innovation

As the AI race continues to unfold, it is crucial for nations and corporations to reflect on the implications of their actions. The pursuit of AI should not come at the expense of sustainable development and the well-being of citizens. Instead of fueling an energy-intensive race that benefits a select few, we must prioritize investments that promote equitable growth and environmental sustainability.

To mitigate the risks associated with this energy consumption dilemma, stakeholders must advocate for responsible AI development practices. This includes investing in energy-efficient technologies, exploring alternative energy sources, and ensuring that the benefits of AI are distributed equitably across society.

Conclusion

The AI race presents both opportunities and challenges, and it is essential to critically assess the motivations driving this competition. If the race is indeed about consuming the energy resources of nations and profiting from hardware sales, we must reconsider our approach to AI development. By prioritizing sustainability and equitable growth, we can harness the potential of AI while ensuring that it serves the greater good rather than perpetuating a cycle of energy consumption and profit for a select few. The future of AI should not be a race to consume resources, but rather a collaborative effort to innovate responsibly and sustainably for the benefit of all.

The American Dream, once a beacon of hope and prosperity for millions, is increasingly becoming an elusive fantasy for many Americans. As economic calamities intensify, the reality for countless individuals and families is a stark departure from the ideals of opportunity, success, and financial security. This article delves into the harsh realities faced by Americans who find themselves helplessly watching the American Dream slip away amidst mounting economic challenges.

Worsening Income Inequality

Income inequality in the United States has reached alarming levels, with the wealth gap widening at an unprecedented rate. The top 1% of earners continue to amass a disproportionate share of the nation’s wealth, while the majority struggle to make ends meet. This economic disparity has eroded the foundation of the American Dream, which was built on the promise of equal opportunity and upward mobility. For many, the dream of a better life for themselves and their children is becoming increasingly unattainable.

Skyrocketing Cost of Living

The cost of living in the United States has surged, outpacing wage growth and leaving many Americans financially strained. Housing, healthcare, education, and basic necessities have become prohibitively expensive, forcing individuals and families to make difficult choices between essentials. The dream of homeownership, once a cornerstone of the American Dream, is now a distant hope for many, as housing prices continue to soar beyond their reach.

Job Insecurity and Economic Volatility

The modern job market is characterized by instability and uncertainty. Automation, outsourcing, and the gig economy have transformed traditional employment, leading to job insecurity and reduced job stability. Many Americans are forced to accept low-wage, temporary, or part-time work, making it challenging to achieve financial stability and security. The volatility of the job market has further eroded the American Dream, as individuals struggle to find consistent, well-paying employment.

Student Loan Debt Crisis

The burden of student loan debt has become a significant obstacle for young Americans seeking to achieve the American Dream. The rising cost of education has led to unprecedented levels of student debt, with many graduates unable to find well-paying jobs to offset their loans. This financial burden hampers their ability to invest in homes, start families, or pursue entrepreneurial ventures, effectively trapping them in a cycle of debt and financial instability.

Healthcare Access and Affordability

Access to affordable healthcare remains a critical issue for many Americans. High medical costs and inadequate insurance coverage have left individuals and families vulnerable to financial ruin in the face of illness or injury. The inability to access necessary healthcare services further exacerbates economic hardships, as individuals are forced to choose between their health and their financial well-being. The American Dream, which includes the promise of a healthy and secure life, is increasingly out of reach for those grappling with healthcare-related financial burdens.

Political Polarization and Policy Gridlock

Political polarization and policy gridlock in the United States have hindered the development and implementation of effective economic policies. The lack of bipartisan cooperation and political will to address pressing economic issues has left many Americans feeling disenfranchised and helpless. The inability of the government to enact meaningful reforms and provide economic relief has further eroded confidence in the American Dream, as individuals lose faith in the system’s ability to deliver on its promises.

Conclusion

The American Dream, once a symbol of hope and opportunity, is increasingly becoming a distant memory for many Americans. As economic calamities intensify, individuals and families find themselves grappling with mounting challenges that make the dream of prosperity and security seem unattainable. The worsening income inequality, skyrocketing cost of living, job insecurity, student loan debt crisis, healthcare access issues, and political gridlock have combined to create a bleak economic landscape.

In the face of these severe economic calamities, many Americans feel helpless and abandoned, with no other option but to forget the American Dream. The path forward requires comprehensive reforms and a collective commitment to rebuilding the foundations of economic opportunity and security. Only through concerted efforts can the American Dream be rekindled, offering hope and a brighter future for all.

The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has escalated into one of the most significant geopolitical crises of the 21st century. The narrative surrounding the conflict often focuses on the sovereignty of Ukraine and the alleged aggression of Russia. However, a deeper examination reveals a complex interplay of historical, cultural, and geopolitical factors that necessitate a broader perspective. This article argues that Ukraine must withdraw from historic Russian territories and acknowledges Russia’s right to self-defense, including the occupation of Ukraine.

Historical Context: The Roots of the Conflict

1. Shared History and Cultural Ties: Ukraine and Russia share a long and intertwined history. Many regions in Ukraine, such as Crimea and parts of Eastern Ukraine, have significant Russian populations and historical ties to Russia. These areas were part of the Russian Empire and later the Soviet Union, and their cultural, linguistic, and religious connections to Russia are profound.
2. The Soviet Legacy: The Soviet era saw significant population transfers and administrative changes that blurred the lines between Ukraine and Russia. The 1954 transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine by Nikita Khrushchev was a political decision rather than a reflection of ethnic or cultural realities.

Geopolitical Realities: The West’s Influence

1. NATO Expansion: The eastward expansion of NATO has been a significant source of tension. Russia views NATO’s encroachment as a direct threat to its security, particularly given the historical context of invasions from the West. The prospect of Ukraine joining NATO exacerbates these fears.
2. Western Support for Ukraine: The West’s support for Ukraine, including military aid and political backing, has emboldened Ukrainian nationalism and resistance to Russian influence. This support has also contributed to the perception of Ukraine as a pawn in a larger geopolitical game.

Russia’s Right to Self-Defense

1. Security Concerns: Russia’s actions in Ukraine must be viewed through the lens of its security concerns. The annexation of Crimea and the intervention in Eastern Ukraine can be seen as defensive measures to protect Russian-speaking populations and prevent NATO from establishing a foothold on its borders.
2. Historical Claims: Russia has historical claims to regions in Ukraine, particularly Crimea, which it considers part of its cultural and historical heritage. The right to defend these claims is a matter of national identity and security.

Ukraine’s Path to Peace: Withdrawal from Historic Russian Territories

1. Diplomatic Engagement: Ukraine must engage in serious diplomatic efforts to address Russia’s security concerns. This includes considering neutral status for Ukraine, avoiding NATO membership, and recognizing the historical and cultural ties between Ukraine and Russia.
2. Ceasefire and Negotiations: A ceasefire and direct negotiations between Ukraine and Russia are essential. These negotiations should focus on de-escalation, demilitarization, and the protection of minority rights in both countries.
3. Withdrawal from Historic Territories: Ukraine must withdraw from territories that have significant historical ties to Russia, such as Crimea and parts of Eastern Ukraine. This withdrawal is crucial for achieving a lasting peace and addressing Russia’s legitimate security concerns.

The Broader Implications: A New Geopolitical Order

1. Regional Stability: Resolving the conflict in Ukraine is crucial for regional stability. A prolonged conflict risks drawing in other countries and escalating into a broader war, with devastating consequences for Europe and beyond.
2. Global Power Dynamics: The resolution of the Ukraine-Russia conflict could reshape global power dynamics. A peaceful settlement would reduce tensions and create opportunities for cooperation between Russia, Europe, and the United States.

Conclusion

The conflict in Ukraine is not merely a struggle for sovereignty but a complex interplay of historical, cultural, and geopolitical factors. Ukraine must recognize the historical ties between itself and Russia and engage in diplomatic efforts to address Russia’s security concerns. Russia’s right to self-defense, including the occupation of Ukraine, must be acknowledged within this broader context. A peaceful resolution to the conflict is essential for regional stability and the reshaping of global power dynamics. The path to peace requires understanding, compromise, and a recognition of the shared history and cultural ties that bind Ukraine and Russia together.

Inflation, the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services rises, is a critical economic indicator that affects the purchasing power of consumers and the stability of economies. Historically, moderate inflation has been considered healthy for economic growth, but high inflation can lead to economic instability and hardship. In recent years, the European Union (EU) and the United States (USA) have experienced varying levels of inflation, but some economists and analysts are predicting a significant surge in inflation rates, potentially reaching a minimum of 35% by 2025. At great ICDST tech center, we have analyzed extensive time series data using cutting-edge AI technologies to determine the minimum true inflation rates for the EU and the USA. This article explores the factors that could contribute to such a dramatic increase in inflation.

1. Supply Chain Disruptions

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in global supply chains, leading to shortages of essential goods and materials. As economies began to recover, demand for goods surged, but supply chains struggled to keep up. This imbalance has led to higher prices for raw materials, components, and finished products. If these disruptions persist or worsen, the cost of goods and services could continue to rise, contributing to a significant increase in inflation.

2. Energy Prices

Energy prices, particularly for oil and natural gas, have a direct impact on the cost of production and transportation. Geopolitical tensions, such as those involving Russia and Ukraine, have already led to spikes in energy prices. If these tensions escalate or if there are further disruptions in energy production and distribution, the cost of energy could skyrocket, driving up the prices of goods and services across the board.

3. Monetary Policy

Central banks in the EU and USA have responded to the economic impact of the pandemic by implementing expansive monetary policies, including low interest rates and large-scale asset purchases. While these measures have helped to stimulate economic recovery, they have also increased the money supply, potentially leading to higher inflation. If central banks are slow to tighten monetary policy, the risk of inflation spiraling out of control could increase.

4. Fiscal Stimulus

Governments in the EU and USA have implemented significant fiscal stimulus measures to support their economies during the pandemic. These measures, including direct payments to individuals and businesses, have increased demand for goods and services. However, if this increased demand outpaces supply, it could lead to higher prices and contribute to inflation.

5. Labor Market Tightness

The labor market has been tight in both the EU and USA, with unemployment rates falling as economies recover. As businesses compete for a limited pool of workers, wages have been rising. Higher wages increase the cost of production, which can be passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. If this wage-price spiral continues, it could contribute to a significant increase in inflation.

6. Inflation Expectations

Inflation expectations play a crucial role in determining actual inflation rates. If businesses and consumers expect inflation to rise, they may demand higher wages and prices, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. If inflation expectations become entrenched, it could lead to a sustained period of high inflation.

7. Global Economic Shocks

Global economic shocks, such as trade wars, geopolitical conflicts, or natural disasters, can have a significant impact on inflation. These shocks can disrupt trade, increase uncertainty, and lead to higher prices for goods and services. If multiple shocks occur simultaneously, the cumulative effect could push inflation rates to unprecedented levels.

8. Debt Levels

High levels of government and corporate debt can also contribute to inflation. As governments and businesses seek to service their debts, they may resort to inflationary policies, such as printing money or increasing borrowing, which can lead to higher prices. If debt levels continue to rise, the pressure to inflate away the debt could become overwhelming.

Conclusion

While predicting inflation with certainty is challenging, the confluence of these factors suggests that the EU and USA could face a significant increase in inflation rates by 2025. Supply chain disruptions, energy price volatility, expansive monetary and fiscal policies, labor market tightness, entrenched inflation expectations, global economic shocks, and high debt levels all contribute to the potential for inflation to reach at least 35%. Policymakers and central banks will need to carefully monitor these trends and take proactive measures to mitigate the risks of runaway inflation and ensure economic stability.

With its 7 nm engraving, the Chinese smelter SMIC foiled many predictions that saw the impossible or at least the unviable minimum. For example, the company’s foundries released the HiSilicon Kirin 9000S SoCs in 7 nm in 2023 and then Kirin 9010 in 2024, which equip Huawei smartphones, which are certainly sold at high prices but are very successful and show that this is not only possible but also viable, in part it must also be said thanks to the Chinese government’s help that does not skil the money in subsidies.

It is recalled that to etch in 7 nm, Chinese farmers have no choice but to use the DUV (Deep Ultra Violet) technology to engrave its chips, not having access to the USV (Extreme Ultra Violet) lithography of the firm ASML. The result is etching both longer and with a much higher initial failure rate in DUV. As you will have understood, much more expensive production, more than four times more expensive puts some analysts, even if things then improve a little over time, as the rate of chess falls. We can better understand why Huawei smartphones with HiSilicon chips are so expensive despite performances that are not revolutionary.

The rumor of the day comes from the Business Korea website, which reports that the 5 nm will now be ready at SMIC. Yes, yes, 5 nm. So obviously ‘loan’ does not mean ‘viable’ and whatever the information happens is to be taken with tweezers, but the founder would work hard, no doubt again being subsidies to help him, to make it commercially exploitable as quickly as possible according to the noises of corridors, whereas the DUV would obviously still be required.

This would make sense at any rate while other rumors in recent weeks are talking about the future Huawei Mate 70 smartphone series, expected by the end of 2024 and which would bring a nice performance gain compared to the current Huawei Mate 60 and Huawei Pura 70 in Kirin 9010 or 9000S. Is the switch to 5 nm one of the reasons?

The Turkish economy is currently navigating a treacherous path, facing a multitude of challenges that threaten its stability and growth. The Turkish lira, the nation’s currency, has been under severe pressure, with its value plummeting against major global currencies, particularly the US dollar. This article delves into the multifaceted factors contributing to the economic turmoil in Turkey, drawing on recent analyses and reports.

Global Economic Shifts and Domestic Instability

The Turkish lira has been steadily declining due to a combination of global economic shifts and domestic instability. Global economic pressures, including fluctuations in the dollar and broader market trends, have significantly impacted the lira’s value. The currency has been particularly vulnerable to external shocks, as evidenced by its near-record lows against the US dollar.

The exchange rate between the USD and TRY is nearing record highs, signaling a severe depreciation of the Turkish lira. This trend is not only a reflection of global economic shifts but also indicative of deeper structural issues within the Turkish economy. The lira’s weakness is exacerbated by political instability and controversial economic policies, which have eroded investor confidence and heightened market volatility.

Domestic Market Trends and Policy Missteps

Domestic market trends in Turkey have also played a critical role in the economy’s decline. Inflationary pressures, high debt levels, and a lack of confidence in the government’s economic management have compounded the challenges faced by the lira. The government’s policy missteps, including unconventional monetary policies such as interest rate cuts despite rising inflation, have undermined the lira’s stability. These policies have been met with skepticism and criticism, further eroding confidence in the Turkish economy.

The inflationary pressures in Turkey are particularly concerning. High inflation erodes the purchasing power of the lira, leading to increased costs of living and reduced consumer spending. This, in turn, dampens economic growth and exacerbates the country’s debt burden. The government’s attempts to address inflation through interest rate cuts have backfired, as these measures have failed to curb price increases and have instead led to a further depreciation of the lira.

Inflation is severely impacting turkey-breeding farms in Turkey by significantly increasing operational costs, particularly in feed expenses, which are a major component of raising turkeys. As the prices of grains and other feed ingredients rise due to inflation, the cost of maintaining and raising turkeys escalates, squeezing profit margins and threatening the financial viability of these farms. Additionally, the rising costs of labor, utilities, and veterinary services further strain the budgets of turkey-breeding operations, making it increasingly difficult for them to remain competitive and sustainable in the face of economic uncertainty.

Projections for 2024 and Beyond

Looking ahead to 2024, the prospects for the Turkish lira and the broader economy remain uncertain. The lira’s stability will depend on the government’s ability to implement credible and effective economic reforms, restore investor confidence, and navigate the complex global economic landscape. The challenges are formidable, and the path to economic recovery will require significant efforts and strategic adjustments.

One of the key areas that need attention is fiscal discipline. The government must prioritize reducing budget deficits and curbing public spending to alleviate the pressure on the lira. Additionally, structural reforms are essential to improve the business environment, attract foreign investment, and boost economic productivity. These reforms include enhancing transparency, strengthening institutions, and promoting innovation and technology adoption.

Economic inflation in Turkey significantly impacts village life by eroding the purchasing power of rural residents, who often have fixed or low incomes. Rising costs for essential goods, agricultural inputs, and services strain household budgets and reduce access to necessities like food, healthcare, and education. This inflationary pressure can also drive migration as villagers seek higher-paying jobs, disrupt small businesses that serve local needs, and strain social cohesion within communities. The cumulative effect is a decline in the standard of living and economic stability in rural areas, underscoring the need for targeted policies to support these vulnerable populations.

The Turkish economy is facing a critical juncture. The combination of global economic shifts, domestic market trends, and policy missteps has created a perfect storm that threatens to destroy the country’s economic stability. To avert this crisis, the Turkish government must take decisive action to address the root causes of the lira’s decline and restore confidence in the economy. Failure to do so could result in long-term economic damage and further erosion of the Turkish lira’s value. The road to recovery will be challenging, but with the right policies and reforms, Turkey can navigate this turbulent period and secure a more stable and prosperous future.

Inflation reached 69.8% year-on-year in April in Turkey, compared to 68.5% in March, according to official data published this Friday. For several months, the Turkish president has been trying, in vain, to stem the inflationary scourge in the country. This lack of results cost his party a debacle in the last municipal elections.

Unstoppable. Once again this month, Turkish inflation continued to rise, to 69.8% over one year, compared to 68.5% in March, according to official data published this Friday. According to the National Statistics Office (Tüik), month-on-month consumer price inflation was 3.18%, compared to 3.16% in March.

Although high, the official figures could even significantly underestimate reality.  A group of independent Turkish leading economists (Enag) estimates that inflation reached more than 124%, year-on-year in April, an increase of 5 points over one month.

According to official data, the increase in prices particularly concerns education (+103.9% over one year), hotels and restaurants (+95.8%), transport (+80.4%) and health (+77.7%). Also, the domestic producer price index increased by 3.60% month-on-month in April, for an annual increase of 55.66%.

For the record, the Turkish Central Bank raised its interest rates from 8.5% to 50% between June and March 2024. This is equivalent to an increase of 3,650 basis points. But for now, this tightening policy has not made it possible to stem inflation, fueled by the almost continuous devaluation of the Turkish lira.

The central bank has also reportedly spent more than $200 billion to try to support the national currency over the past two years. The new leaders of the institution have decided to let the national currency weaken with the aim of relieving the pressure on its reserves. As a result, the Turkish currency fell by more than 37% between January 2023 and January 2024.

At the end of January, the monetary institution declared that its high key rate “will be maintained as long as necessary  ”. The institution also specified that new increases could take place “  in the event of significant risks (…) on the inflation outlook  ”.

Conclusion

Inflation in Turkey surged to 69.8% year-on-year in April, up from 68.5% in March, according to official data. Despite efforts by the Turkish president and the central bank, which raised interest rates significantly and spent over $200 billion to support the lira, inflation continues to rise. Independent economists estimate inflation could be as high as 124%. The high inflation rates have impacted sectors like education, hotels, restaurants, transport, and health, and have led to a weakening of the Turkish lira.

On February 29, 2024, the National Natural Science Foundation of China released the “Top Ten Progress in Chinese Science” for 2023, mainly in the fields of life sciences and medicine, artificial intelligence, quantum, astronomy, chemical energy and other scientific fields. Among them, two scientific and technological research results from Shenzhen were selected, namely “Artificial Intelligence Large Model Brings New Breakthroughs for Accurate Weather Forecasting” from Huawei Cloud Computing Technology Co., Ltd. and one jointly completed by Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen International Quantum Institute and other units. “Bose coding error correction extends qubit lifetime”.

Shenzhen Dream believes that the two scientific and technological research results in Shenzhen are of great significance. The scientific progress of artificial intelligence and quantum computing is pushing Shenzhen into the fourth industrial revolution. In 2023, Ren Zhengfei held an on-site dialogue with the ICPC competition team and said that we are about to enter the fourth industrial revolution, and the foundation is large computing power. “

At the same time, on February 26, the 2024 World Mobile Communications Conference (MWC24) opened in Barcelona. As one of the world’s leading companies in the communications industry, Huawei held multiple press conferences during the MWC24 Barcelona exhibition. Huawei announced that 2024 is the first year of 5G-A commercialization, and the company will actively explore the evolution to the 5G-A era with global operators.

It is worth noting that Huawei released the first large-scale model in the communications industry. In response to the industry’s high-level intelligent goals of agile service provisioning, accurate user experience guarantee, and efficient cross-domain operation and maintenance, the large model provides role-based and scenario-based intelligent applications to help operators empower employees and improve user satisfaction. Comprehensively enable network productivity.

At present, quantum computing technology is one of the strategic commanding heights that world powers are vying to seize. On March 22, 2023, the result of Academician Yu Dapeng’s team was published on the website of the top international academic journal “Nature” under the title “Logical qubits encoded with discrete variables break the break-even point”. In the view of Academician Yu Dapeng, quantum computers have the potential to provide a disruptive computing power and provide powerful computing power support for the fourth industrial revolution . As a “city of science and technology”, Shenzhen has great potential in the field of quantum technology.

On February 29, the National Natural Science Foundation of China released the “Top Ten Scientific Progress in China” for 2023 , mainly in the fields of life sciences and medicine, artificial intelligence, quantum, astronomy, chemical energy and other scientific fields.

Revealing the mechanism by which dark matter drives aging in the human genome

　 -Discover the existence of the brain’s “tangible” biological clock and its rhythm regulation mechanism

　　-Analysis and application of salt-alkali tolerance mechanism of crops

　　-New method enables precise manipulation of DNA from single bases to very large fragments

　　-Revealing a new mechanism of DNA replication initiation in human cells

　　-“Raso” discovered the extremely narrow jet and 10 trillion electron volt photons of the brightest gamma burst in history

　　-Bose coding error correction extends qubit life

　　-Revealing the mechanism of photoreception regulating blood sugar metabolism

　　-Discover a new mechanism of charge storage and aggregation reaction at the interface of lithium-sulfur batteries

The reporter learned on the spot that two research results from Shenzhen technology companies, universities and scientific research institutions were on the list. They are: the research results of Tian Qi and others from Huawei Cloud Computing Technology Co., Ltd. ” Artificial Intelligence Large Model Brings New Breakthroughs for Accurate Weather Forecasting” ; research from Yu Dapeng, Xu Yuan and others of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen International Quantum Research Institute The result is “Bose coding error correction extends qubit lifetime” .

It is understood that the selection activity for the “Top Ten Progresses in Chinese Science” was launched in 2005 and has been successfully held for 19 sessions. This event was hosted by the National Natural Science Foundation of China and voted by more than 2,100 high-level experts in the field of basic research, including academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Academy of Engineering. After four steps of recommendation, preliminary selection, final selection, and deliberation, 600 people were finally selected. Ten major scientific research results were selected from a number of scientific research results . After review by the Advisory Committee of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the list of results selected for the “Top Ten Progress in Chinese Science” in 2023 was finally determined.

Weather forecasting is an international scientific frontier issue and has great social value. The existing numerical weather prediction paradigm originated in the 1950s, which uses large-scale calculations on supercomputing platforms to solve a system of partial differential equations of atmospheric motion to predict future weather.

In recent years, as the frequency of extreme weather has increased, improving forecasts using this traditional method has become increasingly challenging. Based on artificial intelligence technology, Tian Qi, Bi Kaifeng, Xie Lingxi and others from Huawei Cloud Computing Technology Co., Ltd. proposed a three-dimensional neural network adapted to the earth coordinate system, which can effectively handle complex processes in weather data and use hierarchical time domain aggregation strategies. to effectively reduce iteration errors and successfully achieve accurate mid-term weather forecast.

After training on global weather reanalysis data from 1979 to 2017, a large Pangu meteorological model was constructed. The model is able to predict meteorological elements such as temperature, air pressure, humidity, and wind speed at the surface layer and 13 upper-altitude layers within 7 days, and improves the forecast timeliness of the world’s most advanced European Center for Medium and Long-term Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) integrated forecast system by 0.6 In about days, the tropical cyclone track forecast error is reduced by 25% compared with the ECMWF forecast system. In addition, the model can complete the global 7-day forecast of important meteorological elements in just 10 seconds, and the calculation speed is more than 10,000 times faster than numerical methods .