The foundation of modern American financial power rests on a seemingly simple privilege: the ability to print the world’s primary reserve currency. Since the Nixon Shock of 1971 severed the dollar’s final convertibility to gold, the United States has enjoyed what economists term an “exorbitant privilege” . This allows the nation to effectively export its inflation and debt globally, as roughly half of all international trade is invoiced in dollars, forcing other nations to absorb the consequences of U.S. monetary policy .

However, a series of global shifts are challenging this paradigm. Central banks are accumulating gold at a historic rate, and alternative payment systems are emerging. To understand why this matters, one must confront a critical reality: the U.S. cannot “print” gold. This single, immutable fact underpins a structural vulnerability that makes the dollar’s dominance increasingly fragile.

The “Exorbitant Privilege” and Its Limits

In a fiat currency system, money is backed by sovereign credit rather than a physical commodity. For the U.S., this system is uniquely advantageous. When the Federal Reserve expands the money supply, the resulting inflation is not contained within U.S. borders. Because the dollar is used to price everything from oil to electronics, a weaker dollar increases the cost of these goods for other nations, effectively “exporting” U.S. inflation. Foreign central banks are compelled to hold U.S. Treasuries as reserves, financing American debt at low rates .

This system is predicated on trust. As long as the world believes in the dollar’s long-term store of value, the game continues. But trust is eroding. The U.S. federal debt has ballooned to over $40 trillion, and the weaponization of the dollar through sanctions (e.g., freezing Russian assets) has prompted nations to seek alternatives . As one analysis notes, the dollar system is a “geo-economic weapon,” but such weapons often provoke the formation of counter-alliances .

Why Gold Cannot Be Managed Like the Dollar

The core thesis is straightforward: managing a fiat currency requires controlling its supply, interest rates, and global distribution. Managing gold is impossible. The U.S. cannot simply “print” more gold to fund wars, bailouts, or social programs.

1. The Geopolitical Trap: Staged Conflicts and Oil Prices

One strategy to maintain dollar dominance was to manipulate oil prices to suppress gold. The “oil-dollar-gold” triangular theory suggests that by raising oil prices, the U.S. aims to increase global demand for dollars (to pay energy bills), forcing nations to hold dollars rather than accumulating gold . However, this strategy has repeatedly failed. Staged conflicts in the Middle East, intended to spike oil prices and drain dollar liquidity, have not suppressed gold demand. Instead, geopolitical uncertainty drives nations toward the safety of physical gold, independent of the U.S. strategic calculus.

2. The Dilemma of the U.S. Gold Reserve

Some argue that the U.S. would benefit from a gold-centric world because it holds the largest official gold reserves (over 8,100 tons) . Yet this argument is deeply flawed.

• A Weapon That Cannot Be Used: If the U.S. were to dump its gold reserves to suppress prices, it would undermine its own wealth and signal desperation. Given the current global skepticism regarding the dollar, the U.S. cannot risk flooding the market with gold because it is “unsure of the future when all countries will abandon using the U.S. dollar” .
• Buying Gold is Self-Destructive: The U.S. also cannot print dollars to buy gold to increase its reserves. Such an action would accelerate dollar devaluation, create massive demand for gold, pump up its price, and essentially “kill the U.S. dollar by its own hand” .

3. The Banker’s Dilemma: An Economy That Cannot Be Exploited

A real economy based on gold is fundamentally incompatible with modern banking practices. As even Alan Greenspan noted, a gold standard is “not possible in a welfare state” . Why? Because a fiat system allows governments to devalue debt through inflation. A gold standard would restrict the ability to run large deficits and wage expensive wars. The exploitation of the financial system for political and military ends—which is currently facilitated by the printing press—would be rendered virtually impossible.

The Shift Toward a Multipolar World

The modern trend is not necessarily a return to a classical “Gold Standard,” but rather a move toward gold-backed settlement systems. The BRICS nations are leading this charge. They have launched a pilot for a gold-backed currency unit (the “UNIT”) backed by 40% gold and 60% local currencies to bypass the dollar for cross-border trade .

This structural move is far more dangerous to the U.S. than simple price manipulation. By controlling a majority of global gold production and holding massive reserves, these nations are positioning gold as a neutral “settlement asset” that holds no geopolitical allegiance. Furthermore, data reveals that by late 2025, the value of gold held by non-U.S. official institutions slightly exceeded their holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds—a watershed moment indicating the dollar’s dominance is waning .

Conclusion: The End of the Road

The U.S. is caught in a classic financial paradox: it needs the dollar to be strong to maintain its status, but its fiscal policies and geopolitical actions continuously undermine that strength. Gold, by contrast, is a strict disciplinarian.

The U.S. cannot print it, cannot control its value through fiat policy, and cannot weaponize it without losing its own stockpile’s value. The attempted suppression of gold via oil wars has failed. The risk of dumping gold reserves is too high. The attempt to buy gold would destroy the dollar. This leaves the U.S. in a position where its primary financial superpower advantage—the printing press—is its greatest weakness in a world shifting back toward sound, unprintable assets. The exploitation model of modern banking simply cannot survive a transition to a gold-referenced global economy.

For decades, the global order has been underpinned by a simple but powerful bargain: the world trades oil in U.S. dollars, and in return, the U.S. provides security for global shipping lanes. However, a series of recent events—from the war in Ukraine to the disruption of critical Middle Eastern chokepoints—suggests that this system is not merely evolving but is being actively reshaped. This article examines the evidence that points toward a coordinated strategy: one designed to weaponize energy, isolate rivals, and ultimately preserve the fading dominance of the American petrodollar.

The Ukraine Conflict: A Catalyst for European Energy Dependency

The narrative that the Russia-Ukraine conflict was a simple act of aggression overlooks a profound shift in the global energy map. Before the war, the European Union was heavily reliant on Russian gas, with Russia accounting for around 40% of the EU’s natural gas supply . This dependency gave Moscow significant leverage and provided Europe with relatively cheap energy, fueling its industrial base.

The outbreak of war, however, severed this link. The subsequent EU sanctions and Russia’s response effectively cut off the primary pipelines, such as Nord Stream and Yamal-Europe . The result was a dramatic restructuring of the European gas supply network. To fill the void, Europe turned to Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), with the U.S. becoming a primary beneficiary . In fact, U.S. LNG exports to the EU surged from around 17 million tons annually to 50 million tons in 2023, with projections suggesting the EU could depend on the U.S. for 80% of its LNG imports by 2028 .

From this perspective, the conflict served a dual purpose: it weakened Russia economically and strategically while simultaneously forcing Europe to replace cheap Russian pipeline gas with more expensive American LNG, entrenching U.S. energy dominance on the continent.

Brexit: More Than a Political Divorce

Similarly, the United Kingdom’s departure from the EU is often framed as a matter of sovereignty and immigration. However, the economic and regulatory realities point to another layer of the story. The UK, a significant oil producer in the North Sea, exited the EU’s highly coordinated environmental and regulatory framework .

Research indicates that the post-Brexit period was marked by a “capacity vacuum” for UK regulators, which led to a short-term “impunity for polluting firms” . A grid-cell analysis of satellite-detected oil spills found that after Brexit, UK waters experienced significantly more oil spills compared to EU and Norwegian jurisdictions . By shedding the stringent regulatory oversight of the EU, the UK allowed a new ecosystem of firms to reap short-term profits, potentially reducing operational costs for its oil sector while weakening environmental protections . This interpretation suggests that Brexit allowed the UK to prioritize its fossil fuel industry’s competitiveness over collective EU standards.

Squeezing the Strait: The Bab-el-Mandeb and Strait of Hormuz

In an analysis by IndexBox, the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, specifically the targeting of shipping in the Red Sea (Bab-el-Mandeb) and the Strait of Hormuz, have had immediate consequences for the global economy. These chokepoints are vital arteries for global oil and LNG trade. Recent reports indicate that up to 12 million barrels per day of liquids (12% of global production) and 86 million tonnes of LNG (20% of the global total) are currently shut in due to these disruptions .

The evidence shows that this disruption has a specific benefit for the U.S. As global supplies tighten, energy prices surge. Reports confirm that U.S. LNG exports have jumped sharply, with American producers enjoying a windfall . In this context, the disruption of Middle Eastern oil routes serves to increase global reliance on U.S. energy exports. Major energy importers like China, India, and the EU are forced to scramble for alternatives, and the U.S. stands ready to fill the gap—at a premium. This creates a scenario where the rivals and allies of the U.S. alike are economically squeezed by higher prices, while the American energy sector booms .

The Allegory of Netanyahu: Blaming the Puppet

One of the most striking aspects of the current geopolitical narrative is the portrayal of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the primary aggressor pushing a reluctant U.S. President into war in middle east. This narrative, according to analysts, is “not only silly but also pernicious” .

Evidence suggests that the U.S. was already on the path to confrontation. The Trump administration had moved massive naval assets to the region, encouraged protests in rival country, and had likely already decided on a military course . Reports indicate that Trump was a “willing and full partner” in the conflict, and his decision-making was supported by his own advisors, not solely by Netanyahu . By shifting the blame to Netanyahu, the U.S. can maintain the image of an “innocent player” being forced into war, obscuring its own strategic motives . In reality, the U.S. was able to coordinate militarily with Israel while reaping the economic benefits of the ensuing energy crisis, a strategy that would be harder to sell to a war-weary public if it appeared to be entirely Washington’s initiative.

A War on the Dollar? The Global Counter-Move

The ultimate consequence of this energy-driven instability is its impact on the global financial system. The strategy of driving up energy prices has a dual-edged effect. While it benefits American exporters in the short term, it also fuels global inflation and destabilizes economies that are heavily dependent on energy imports .

Central banks, particularly in countries like China, Poland, and India, are responding to this volatility and the weaponization of the dollar by turning to gold. Central bank purchases of gold have averaged approximately 1,000 tonnes per year since 2022, double the pace of the preceding decade, as countries seek to diversify their reserves .

The current energy crisis is accelerating the transition away from fossil fuels. The prospect of persistently high oil and gas prices makes renewable energy more economically viable, and countries like China have already positioned themselves as the dominant force in green technology, manufacturing roughly 80% of the world’s solar panels . As the world shifts to a greener economy, the demand for oil is projected to plateau, undermining the foundation of the U.S. dollar’s supremacy. A post-carbon world is a post-petrodollar world .

By trying to maintain its dominance through fossil fuels, the U.S. is ironically accelerating its own irrelevance. The world’s strategic goal is no longer to secure oil but to build energy systems that “cannot be blocked or held hostage” . The move by major economies to buy gold, secure critical minerals, and invest in renewables represents a concerted effort to break free from the U.S.-centered energy order, setting the stage for a multipolar world where the dollar no longer reigns supreme.

The recent surge in oil prices and the corresponding decline in gold prices amidst escalating Middle East tensions have followed a pattern so predictable it begs the question: are these conflicts genuine geopolitical crises, or are they staged financial operations designed to artificially depress the price of gold? The evidence suggests the latter—that these manufactured crises serve a singular purpose: to prevent gold from usurping the US dollar as the world’s primary reserve asset.

The Mechanism of Financial Suppression

When tensions flare in the Middle East, the market response has become mechanically reliable. Oil prices spike as supply disruption fears grip traders, while gold prices are simultaneously driven downward. This inverse relationship is not a coincidence but a carefully orchestrated dynamic. As the Middle East conflict has unfolded, we have observed exactly this pattern: oil prices surged approximately 57% from $71.23 to $111.54 per barrel, while gold fell from $5,294.40 to $4,651.50 per ounce during the same period .

The mechanism is straightforward. Rising oil prices reignite inflation concerns, which in turn fuel expectations that central banks—particularly the US Federal Reserve—will maintain elevated interest rates . Higher interest rates make non-yielding assets like gold less attractive, artificially suppressing its price. This allows the dollar to maintain its dominance by removing gold as a viable alternative.

Central Banks See Through the Deception

Despite these coordinated attempts to suppress gold prices, central banks worldwide have seen through the charade. The August 2026 historic session of all central banks underscored a unified commitment: gold must be accumulated at any cost to protect national currencies in the coming global economic upheaval.

This is not speculation. Central bank gold buying has accelerated dramatically, with gold reserves now representing 27% of global official reserves—surpassing US Treasuries at 22% and the euro at 15% . This structural shift represents the most significant realignment in the global monetary system since the end of the gold standard.

The motivations behind this strategic accumulation are clear. According to recent surveys, 51% of central banks cite “protection against geopolitical risk” as the primary driver for gold purchases, while 82% now hold physical gold, up from 71% in previous years . The message is unmistakable: central banks are preparing for a world where the US dollar is no longer the undisputed reserve currency.

The Dollar’s Fatal Flaw

The fundamental problem with the dollar-based system is that the United States can print unlimited currency to purchase real goods and services, effectively exporting its inflation to the rest of the world. This privilege is ending. As de-dollarization accelerates, the world is shifting toward a multi-polar monetary system where gold will reclaim its historical role .

Central banks recognize that in the near future, when gold inevitably replaces the US dollar as the anchor of the global monetary system, its price will reach unprecedented levels—potentially millions of dollars per ounce. This explains the urgency behind the August 2026 session and the aggressive buying programs being implemented by central banks worldwide.

The Stakes Could Not Be Higher

The artificial suppression of gold prices through engineered geopolitical crises is the last desperate act of a system facing obsolescence. Each conflict that sends oil prices soaring and gold prices plunging is another attempt to maintain the illusion of dollar dominance.

But the truth is emerging. Central banks are diversifying away from dollar-denominated assets, with 30% planning to increase gold allocations over the next one to two years . The physical stockpiling of gold continues unabated, with net purchases of 244 tonnes in the first quarter of 2026 alone—the strongest quarterly result in over a year .

The global financial system is at an inflection point. The August 2026 session of all central banks was not a routine meeting—it was a recognition that gold alone offers protection against the coming storm. Those who ignore this reality and fail to accumulate physical gold will see their currencies decimated when the dollar’s reserve status finally collapses.

In the world of search engine optimization (SEO), backlinks play a crucial role in determining a website’s ranking and visibility. Backlinks are essentially links from other websites that point to your site, acting as a vote of confidence in the eyes of search engines like Google. However, this valuable tool has a dark side, as hackers have found ways to exploit backlinks for their own malicious purposes. In this article, we will explore how hackers use other websites to get free backlinks and promote malicious websites, and what website owners can do to protect themselves.

The Importance of Backlinks

Before delving into the tactics used by hackers, it’s essential to understand the importance of backlinks in the world of SEO. Backlinks are one of the most critical factors that search engines use to determine a website’s authority and relevance. When a website has a high number of quality backlinks, it signals to search engines that the site is trustworthy and valuable, which can lead to higher rankings and increased visibility.

However, not all backlinks are created equal. Search engines like Google have become increasingly sophisticated in their ability to distinguish between high-quality and low-quality backlinks. Low-quality backlinks, such as those from spammy or irrelevant websites, can actually harm a website’s ranking and reputation.

How Hackers Exploit Backlinks

Hackers have found ways to exploit the value of backlinks for their own malicious purposes. One common tactic is to use automated tools to create large numbers of low-quality backlinks to their malicious websites. These backlinks are often created on spammy or irrelevant websites, which can harm the reputation of the websites they are linking to.

Another tactic used by hackers is to exploit vulnerabilities in other websites to insert their own backlinks. This can be done through techniques such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting (XSS), which allow hackers to inject malicious code into a website’s database or HTML code. Once the backlinks are inserted, they can be used to promote the hacker’s malicious website or to redirect users to a phishing or malware site.

The Impact of Malicious Backlinks

The impact of malicious backlinks can be significant for both the website owner and the users who are redirected to the malicious site. For website owners, the presence of low-quality or malicious backlinks can harm their search engine rankings and reputation, leading to a loss of traffic and revenue. In some cases, search engines may even penalize a website for having too many low-quality backlinks, which can be difficult to recover from.

For users, the impact of malicious backlinks can be even more severe. Users who are redirected to a phishing or malware site may have their personal information stolen or their devices infected with malware. This can lead to financial loss, identity theft, and other serious consequences.

Protecting Your Website from Malicious Backlinks

Website owners can take several steps to protect themselves from malicious backlinks and the harm they can cause. One of the most important steps is to regularly monitor your website’s backlink profile using tools like Google Search Console or Ahrefs. This can help you identify any suspicious or low-quality backlinks and take action to remove them.

Another important step is to keep your website’s software and plugins up to date, as this can help prevent vulnerabilities that hackers can exploit to insert malicious backlinks. It’s also a good idea to use security plugins or services that can help detect and prevent malicious activity on your website.

Backlinks are a valuable tool for website owners looking to improve their search engine rankings and visibility. However, they also have a dark side, as hackers have found ways to exploit them for their own malicious purposes. By understanding the tactics used by hackers and taking steps to protect your website, you can help prevent the harm that malicious backlinks can cause. Remember to regularly monitor your website’s backlink profile, keep your software and plugins up to date, and use security tools to detect and prevent malicious activity.

We can’t clearly identify hackers at this moment but our search engine clawer has detected malicious websites that buy such illegal backlinks. Such links were attributed using style=”display:none” to make sure it is not visible to viewers. One good technique that search engines can do is not to allow hidden links and contents to hurt page reputation simply by ignoring them as hidden content. Here we give you a list of them. :

http://situs-akun-pro.lilys.com/products/akun-pro-kamboja
http://banyak-berdoa.lilys.com/products/akun-pro-thailand
http://akun-pro-thailand-server-luar.lilys.com/
http://slot-depositdana.lilys.com/
http://maxwinslotgacor.lilys.com/
http://slotgacormalamini.wr-tinggi.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor
http://ufabet.lilys.com/products/ufabet
http://ufabet.lilys.com/
http://ufabet.rememberingalife.com/
http://slotgacormalamini.wr-tinggi.lilys.com/
http://maxwin0slot.lilys.com/products/slot-maxwin
http://maxwin0slot.lilys.com/
http://gampang-menang.lilys.com/
http://gacor-2023.walesbonner.net/
http://sl0tgacor-gampangmenang.lilys.com/
http://sl0tgacor-gampangmenang.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-maxwin
http://nexusslot.lilys.com/
http://nexusslot.lilys.com/products/nexus-slot
http://slot-dana-nexus.lilys.com/
http://slot-dana-nexus.lilys.com/products/slot-deposit-dana
http://sl0tgacor777.lilys.com/
http://data-sdy1.lilys.com/
http://slotgacorrrrrrr.lilys.com/
http://slotgacorrrrrrr.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-2023
http://gamers-ganteng-idaman.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-2023
http://demo-slot-rupiah.lilys.com/products/slot-demo
https://slots.stoelzle-lausitz.com/
https://slots.beziergames.com/
https://slot-gampangmenang.matthewwilliamson.com/
http://slot777-linkmaxwin.lilys.com/
http://slot777-linkmaxwin.lilys.com/products/slot777
http://slot.gacor-88.lilys.com/
http://slot.gacor-88.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-88
http://slotluarnegeri.walesbonner.net/products/slot-server-luar
http://slotluarnegeri.walesbonner.net/products/slot-luar-negeri
http://slotluarnegeri.walesbonner.net/
http://slot-deposit-pulsa4.walesbonner.net/products/slot-4d
http://slot-deposit-pulsa4.walesbonner.net/
http://super-gacor-server-thailand-slot.lilys.com/
http://slot-gac0r-2023.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-2023/
http://slot-gac0r-2023.lilys.com/
http://akun-pr0-thailand1.lilys.com/products/akun-pro-thailand
http://akun-pr0-thailand1.lilys.com/
http://pro-kamboja-asli.lilys.com/products/akun-pro-kamboja
http://pro-kamboja-asli.lilys.com/
http://foreign-slot.lilys.com/products/slot-luar-negeri
http://slot88-jp.lilys.com/products/slot88/
http://slot88-jp.lilys.com
http://akun-pr0-platinum.lilys.com/products/akun-pro-platinum
https://akun-pr0-platinum.lilys.com/
http://depo10k-slot.walesbonner.net/
http://depo10k-slot.walesbonner.net/products/slot-depo-10k
https://sl0t88.bambinomio.com/
https://sl0t88.bambinomio.com/products/slot88
http://thailand-pro-account.lilys.com/products/akun-pro-thailand
https://slot-gacor-malam-ini.bambinomio.com/products/slot-gacor-malam-ini
https://slot-gacor-malam-ini.bambinomio.com/
https://pgslot.buffalogardens.com/
https://pgslot.buffalogardens.com/products/pgslot
http://abroad-server-slot.lilys.com/products/slot-server-luar
https://idn-slot.merchmadeeasy.com/
https://idn-slot.merchmadeeasy.com/products/idnslot
https://slot88-2023.sammcknight.com/
https://slot88-2023.sammcknight.com/products/slot88
https://sl0t-thailand.merchmadeeasy.com/products/slot-thailand/
https://sl0t-thailand.merchmadeeasy.com/
https://slot-gacor-malam-ini.sammcknight.com/products/slot-gacor-malam-ini
https://sloter-luar-negeri.merchmadeeasy.com/
http://slot-maxwin-maks.lilys.com/products/slot-maxwin
http://maxwin-slot.sammcknight.com/products/maxwin-slot
https://slot-thailand1.ahlemeyewear.com/
https://slot-thailand1.ahlemeyewear.com/products/slot-thailand/
https://akun-thailand-pro.alterbridge.com/
https://akun-thailand-pro.alterbridge.com/products/akun-pro-thailand
http://slot-gacor-2023jp.lilys.com/
http://slot-gacor-2023jp.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-2023
http://slot-dana.sammcknight.com/products/slot-dana
https://pgslot.rememberingalife.com/
https://pgslot.rememberingalife.com/products/pgslot
http://slot-demo-akun.lilys.com/
https://akun-pro-thailand.alterbridge.com/products/akun-pro-thailand
https://akun-pro-thailand.alterbridge.com/
https://slot77-pulsa.buffalogardens.com/products/slot777
http://sg88.lilys.com/
http://sg88.lilys.com/products/garansi-kekalahan-100
http://slot-n-rtp.lilys.com/
http://slot-n-rtp.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-2023/
http://tonight-steady-slot.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-malam-ini
https://bk8.stoelzle-lausitz.com/
http://slot-gacor-easytowin.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-gampang-menang
http://steady-slot-maxwin.lilys.com/
https://slot-gacor-luar.ladelle.com/
https://slot-gacor2023.ahlemeyewear.com/
http://slot-depo-10k.sammcknight.com/products/slot-depo-10k
https://slot-luar-server.alterbridge.com/products/slot-luar-negeri/
https://slot-luar-server.alterbridge.com/
http://slot-malam-ini-gacor.rememberingalife.com/products/slot-gacor-malam-in
http://slot-malam-ini-gacor.rememberingalife.com/
https://slot-demo-rupiah.alterbridge.com
https://slot-demo-rupiah.alterbridge.com/products/slot-demo-rupiah
http://agen5000.walesbonner.net/
http://agen5000.walesbonner.net/products/deposit-slot5000/
http://slotdeposit-5000.oenling.com/
http://slotgacor2023.oenling.com/
http://slotgacor2023.oenling.com/products/slot-gacor-2023
http://situs-tot0.walesbonner.net/products/situs-toto/
http://situs-tot0.walesbonner.net/
http://slotgacor.88.walesbonner.net/
https://dana-slot.enamelpinfactory.com/
https://dana-slot.enamelpinfactory.com/products/slot-dana
https://slot-pulsa-indosat.crankbrothers.com/
https://slot-thailand-4d.stillspirits.com
https://slot-thailand-4d.stillspirits.com/products/link-slot-thailand-4d
https://demo-slot-rupiah.enamelpinfactory.com/
https://demo-slot-rupiah.enamelpinfactory.com/products/slot-demo/
https://bonanza-slotgacor.crankbrothers.com/
https://mposlot-gacor.crankbrothers.com/
http://slot-gopay5000.oenling.com/
http://slot-gopay5000.oenling.com/products/slot-gopay
https://akun-pro-jepun.enamelpinfactory.com/products/akun-pro-jepang
https://akun-pro-jepun.enamelpinfactory.com/
https://slot-bonus.santambroeus.com/
http://slotviaovo.walesbonner.net/
https://hoki-slot.sammcknight.com/
https://slotgacor-88.santambroeus.com/
https://slot-gacor777.smglobalshop.com/
https://slot-deposit-dana.santambroeus.com/
http://linkslot-mpo.walesbonner.net/
https://slotgacor-malamini.smglobalshop.com/
https://slot-hoki.smglobalshop.com/products/slot-hoki
https://slot-pulsa.smglobalshop.com/products/slot-pulsa
https://slotpulsa-indosat.smglobalshop.com/products/slot-pulsa
http://akun-pro-jepang.oenling.com/products/akun-pro-jepang
http://akun-pro-jepang.oenling.com/
http://sl0t-gacor-777.oenling.com/products/slot-gacor-777
http://sl0t-gacor-777.oenling.com/
https://slotgacor-gampang-menang.stoelzle-lausitz.com/
https://slot-maxwin-gacor.stoelzle-lausitz.com/
https://slot-maxwin-gacor.stoelzle-lausitz.com/products/slot-gacor-maxwin
https://akun-proplatinum.stoelzle-lausitz.com/
http://sl0t-gacormaxwin.lilys.com/products/slot-gacor-maxwin
http://sl0t-gacormaxwin.lilys.com/
https://sl0t-gacor-4d.stoelzle-lausitz.com/products/slot-gacor-4d
https://sl0t-gacor-4d.stoelzle-lausitz.com/
https://akun-pro-jepang.buffalogardens.com/
https://slot-gacor-legal.lundhumphries.com/
https://slot-luar.lundhumphries.com/
https://pasarantogel2.smglobalshop.com/
https://pasarantogel2.smglobalshop.com/products/pasarantogel2
http://ecolab.khnu.km.ua/
https://servicioseditoriales.unam.mx/trimestre_ojs3308/public/slot-gacor/
https://slot-luar-negeri.shaunleane.com/products/slot-luar-negeri
http://tour.khnu.km.ua/
https://slot-gacor-malam-ini.shaunleane.com/
https://slot-depo-10k.shaunleane.com/products/slot-depo-10k
https://slot-depo-10k.shaunleane.com/
https://slot-deposit-pulsa.shaunleane.com/products/slot777
https://slot-gacor-maxwin.allensboots.com/
https://akun-pro-thailand.shaunleane.com/products/akun-pro-thailand
https://akun-pro-thailand.shaunleane.com/
https://slotdepo5000.shaunleane.com/
https://slot-vip.shaunleane.com/
https://akun-pro-kamboja.shaunleane.com/products/akun-pro-kamboja
https://akun-pro-kamboja.shaunleane.com/
https://depo25bonus25.shaunleane.com/
http://slot-gacor-malam-ini.samvilla.com/
https://pasarantogel2.shaunleane.com/products/pasarantogel2
https://pasarantogel2.shaunleane.com/

The global economic landscape has long been dominated by the United States, primarily due to its control over the world’s reserve currency, the US dollar. However, the rise of the BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—presents a significant challenge to this dominance. This article explores how the BRICS can limit the USA’s economic influence, isolate it for decades, and the implications of this shift. Additionally, it delves into the mechanics of the US dollar’s dominance, the trade deficits it creates, and the strategies BRICS can employ to counter this dominance.

The US Dollar’s Dominance: A Double-Edged Sword

The US dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency allows the United States to print money without corresponding real production. This privilege enables the US to finance its trade deficits, as other countries hold dollars as reserves. However, this system also creates vulnerabilities. The US has trade deficits with almost every country, as it imports more than it exports. This imbalance is sustained by the global demand for dollars, but it also undermines the US economy’s long-term stability.

The Secrets of the US Dollar’s Dominance

1. Petrodollar System: The petrodollar system, established in the 1970s, requires oil-exporting countries to sell their oil in US dollars. This ensures a constant demand for dollars, reinforcing their global dominance.
2. Military and Political Influence: The US leverages its military and political power to maintain dollar dominance. Wars, sanctions, and diplomatic pressure are used to ensure that countries continue to use the dollar.
3. Financial Markets: The depth and liquidity of US financial markets attract global investments, further cementing the dollar’s role.

How BRICS Can Limit the USA’s Economic Influence

1. Developing an Alternative Reserve Currency: BRICS can create a new reserve currency or use a basket of currencies to reduce reliance on the US dollar. The Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) could be a starting point.
2. Expanding Bilateral Trade Agreements: BRICS countries can increase trade among themselves using their own currencies, bypassing the dollar. This would reduce the demand for dollars and weaken its dominance.
3. Promoting Regional Financial Institutions: BRICS can strengthen regional financial institutions like the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) to provide alternative financing options.
4. Diversifying Energy Trade: BRICS can negotiate energy deals using non-dollar currencies, particularly with oil-rich countries. This would undermine the petrodollar system.

The Implications of BRICS’ Hammer on the USA’s Head

1. Economic Isolation: As BRICS reduces reliance on the US dollar, the USA could face economic isolation. This would limit its ability to finance trade deficits and maintain global influence.
2. Weakened Financial Markets: A decline in dollar dominance could lead to reduced demand for US Treasury bonds, affecting the US government’s ability to borrow and potentially leading to higher interest rates.
3. Shift in Global Power Dynamics: The rise of BRICS and the decline of US economic dominance could lead to a multipolar world, with new centers of power emerging. This would reshape global trade, politics, and security dynamics.
4. Increased Instability: The transition from a dollar-centric world to a multipolar financial system could be turbulent, with potential financial crises and geopolitical tensions.

Conclusion

The BRICS nations have the potential to limit the USA’s economic dominance and isolate it for decades by challenging the US dollar’s hegemony. Through the development of alternative reserve currencies, expanding bilateral trade agreements, promoting regional financial institutions, and diversifying energy trade, BRICS can weaken the dollar’s grip on the global economy. The implications of this shift are profound, potentially leading to economic isolation for the USA, weakened financial markets, a shift in global power dynamics, and increased instability during the transition. The era of US economic supremacy may be coming to an end, ushering in a new era of multipolarity.

China has changed and is no longer the “developing country” sometimes described in the past. Apart from its importance in trade with Europe, it is an actor with which relations have intensified in the fields of research and development or in that of technology. For the EU, China is both an economic partner and competitor, and a system and governance rival or alternative .

The objectives of the partnership
The EU’s primary objective is to be united against the Chinese giant. In March 2019, the European Commission published a strategic plan for China including concrete actions such as, for example:

To defend the objectives of the United Nations in matters of human rights, peace and security;

Commit to reducing CO2 emissions for the climate (China being both the first emitter, a builder of coal plants in other countries, but also the country that invests the most in renewable energies);

Agree with China to ensure peace and security in areas or countries where Beijing has influence such as Iran, the Horn of Africa, North Korea or the Gulf of Aden. Potential conflicts are numerous, including in the China Sea;

Find reciprocity in trade by avoiding protectionism or excessive support for local industries (via the WTO), as well as the difficulties linked to state ownership of certain companies;

Take into account in public contracts not only the price criterion, but also the working environment;

Strengthen security related to new technologies (such as 5G) to prevent hacking and espionage.

The aim of this plan is to adopt a less “naive”, more pragmatic and more realistic approach to the PRC, without giving in to overbidding, escalation or trade war. Balance is therefore difficult to find. But it is true that on each of the above points, examples abound of European failures. Overall, China has captured many markets by adopting operating rules that have allowed it to exercise “unfair competition” . To maintain its exchanges with Beijing, the European Union must therefore adopt a more offensive strategy.

Lessons from the past
Historically, the first diplomatic relations were established in 1975. A first strategic partnership plan was adopted in 2003. Others followed, until the recent “EU-China 2020 Strategic Agenda for Cooperation” plan , adopted in 2013.

This, now replaced by new objectives, remained very political and not very economical. The areas dealt with concerned peace, security, information, urbanization, climate, social progress, culture, education … Of course, the major sectors such as transport, aeronautics, energy , agriculture and more generally science and innovation were also discussed, but often succinctly to indicate that the two entities will cooperate and develop “joint initiatives” (joint laboratories, data exchange, etc.).

Finally, it seems after a few years that this has been done for the benefit of China. The example of the development of aeronautics or biotechnologies in China shows that Western countries have lost more than gained, both in terms of market share and technology transfer.

In the early 2000s, for example, France sold hundreds of Airbus A320s under contracts signed during official visits, with production and assembly in China as a counterpart with transfer of knowledge. Today, the China Commercial Aircraft Corporation is able to produce a new C919 aircraft , which will compete directly with the Airbus A320. The certificate of airworthiness could arrive this year and nearly a thousand orders have already been placed.

Today’s relationships and instruments
Moreover, despite these strategic plans, economic relations remain dependent on current events.

Even if the latest plan mentions the situation in Xinjiang (Uyghur Autonomous Region), a few words at a press conference can deteriorate relations. Recently, the European sanctions linked to the fate of the Uyghurs provoked the anger of China, which reacted with counter-sanctions which can go beyond the diplomatic sphere and result in the calling into question of trade agreements and in particular of the “Comprehensive Agreement on Investments” . However, these advances are crucial from an economic point of view. For example, German (Volkswagen, Siemens, BMW) or French (banks in particular) companies expect a lot.

In addition, China remains very firm in its will to implement its famous “Belt and Road Initiative”, and the countries of Eastern Europe are on the way. Moreover, relations with the European Union are often referred to as “17 + 1” (or 16 + 1), counting the countries of the East as one, which allows China to negotiate directly with them.

Other disputes over 5G and Huawei or the origin of the Covid also disrupt these relations. Europeans Nokia and Ericsson could provide the EU with 5G infrastructure, but Huawei is better placed on the price / quality level. Also, beyond these economic questions, political choices are taken into account, particularly with regard to security conditions , such as those related to data protection or the risk of espionage. With diplomatic language, we indicate that the EU is not opposed to any company but must avoid dependence on risky suppliers … China, for its part, sees it as disguised protectionism.

Despite everything, trade is important: the EU is the second largest trading power and the largest exporter of products and services. Together, China, Europe and the United States account for 46% of international merchandise trade in 2019. EU trade in goods (exports and imports) with the rest of the world represents around 15% of trade global. For goods, Europe’s leading export partners are the United States (406 billion) then China (210 billion), and in terms of imports, China (394 billion) then the United States (267 billion) according to Eurostat:

China EU.

In trade matters, the European Commission negotiates free trade agreements with the rest of the world, but the Member States have their say, through the Council of the EU (consulted) and the Parliament (which has a power of veto). The official objective of the EU is set in the Functioning Treaty of the European Union which specifies in its article 206:

“The Union contributes, in the common interest, to the harmonious development of world trade, to the gradual abolition of restrictions on international trade and foreign direct investment, as well as to the reduction of customs and other barriers. “

As a result, economic policy with China is turned, as in other geographic areas (Canada, Japan, etc.) towards negotiations aimed at developing trade and not protectionism. Nevertheless, the EU has equipped itself with tools to defend against unfair practices with very extensive competition law. The examples of sanctions against American firms (digital giants) are emblematic of this power.

In addition, the EU has integrated into its new trade strategy adopted in February 2021 called “Trade policy review: An open, sustainable and assertive trade policy” the respect of the Paris agreements on the climate and the respect of European standards (environmental by example). Without explicitly targeting China, these rules are a way of guiding economic policy.

They are accompanied by the trade defense instruments mentioned above. Anti-dumping is a typical example. A product is considered to have benefited from dumping when its selling price in Europe is lower than the price in the exporting country. This practice, which aims to capture markets in order to find itself in a dominant position, is often criticized against China. European legislation therefore aims today to speed up decision-making before it is too late because the markets and shareholdings are changing very quickly.

A recent example can be cited with the leather shoes imported from China . In 2006, to counter this dumping, the EU took radical measures by imposing customs duties of 19.4% on Chinese exporters on the grounds that they benefited from state subsidies contrary to WTO rules.

In conclusion, the EU intends to show its strength in its economic relations with China. For this, in addition to bilateral discussions, it strives to play a leading role within the World Trade Organization (WTO) by giving the Commission a negotiating role for all the Member States and expressing itself with one voice when negotiating trade treaties, instead of lining up behind the United States or leaving in disarray.

According to a recent report from Goldman Sachs, a renowned global financial institution, the world economy is predicted to be predominantly led by Asian countries by 2050. However, among the top ten leading economies, there will also be a South American country.

The report highlights Brazil as the South American nation that is expected to secure a position within the top ten, showcasing significant economic growth with a projected nominal GDP of 8.7 trillion dollars. Goldman Sachs analysis indicates that Brazil is anticipated to hold the eighth position in the ranking of the world’s leading economic powers by 2050, maintaining this position even after 25 years.

It is important to note that despite the recent slowdown in real GDP growth across developed and emerging economies, there are still nations that will continue to dominate the global economic landscape in the years to come. According to Goldman Sachs, the five largest economies in the world by 2050 will be China, the United States, India, Indonesia, and Germany.

These projections are based on GDP estimates combined with long-term real exchange rate projections, which allow for the anticipation of the real value of the US dollar in major economies over time. Looking ahead to 2075, the United States is expected to face a more challenging outlook, as it would be surpassed by China and India, securing the third position. Indonesia, on the other hand, is projected to maintain its fourth position. Additionally, an African economy, Nigeria, is predicted to emerge and occupy the fifth position.

Overall, the report highlights the shifting dynamics of the global economy, with Asian countries and Brazil expected to play a significant role in driving growth and development. It also underscores the importance of long-term planning and investment in emerging markets, as these nations are likely to offer significant opportunities for businesses and investors in the years to come.

However, it is important to note that these projections are subject to change based on a range of factors, including political and economic developments, technological advancements, and shifts in global trade patterns. As such, it is crucial for policymakers and business leaders to remain vigilant and adaptable in the face of these changes, in order to ensure continued growth and prosperity for their respective nations and industries.

When it comes to buying a used car, the excitement of finding the perfect vehicle can often overshadow the essential due diligence needed to ensure a smart purchase. One of the most critical steps in this process is using a title checker that can reveal vital information about the car’s history, helping you avoid potential pitfalls and make an informed decision. Here’s why using a title checker is the most effective approach when buying a used car.

Reason 1. Uncover Hidden Issues

A title checker provides a comprehensive report on the vehicle’s history. This includes information about past accidents, flood damage, and any title branding such as salvage or rebuilt status. These issues might not be immediately visible upon inspection but can significantly impact the car’s value and safety.

Reason 2. Verify Ownership and Title Status

A title checker can confirm the ownership status and reveal any outstanding liens on the vehicle. This step is vital to avoid legal complications that could arise from purchasing a car with unresolved ownership issues or unpaid loans.

Reason 3. Prevent Odometer Fraud

Odometer fraud is when sellers tamper with the odometer to show a lower mileage than the car has actually traveled. A title checker can provide odometer readings from various points in the car’s history, allowing you to verify the accuracy of the current reading. This helps ensure that you are getting a fair deal based on the car’s true mileage.

Reason 4. Access Maintenance Records

Some title checkers offer insights into the vehicle’s maintenance history. This can include records of oil changes, major repairs, and routine maintenance. Understanding the car’s maintenance history can give you an idea of how well it has been cared for and what kind of issues you might expect in the future.

Reason 5. Peace of Mind

Buying a used car can be a stressful experience, filled with uncertainty and doubt. Using a title checker gives you a clearer picture of the vehicle’s history. With this information, you can make a more confident and informed decision, knowing that you have taken the necessary steps to protect your investment.

Reason 6. Negotiation Power

If the report reveals any issues, you can use this as leverage to lower the asking price or ask the seller to address the problems before finalizing the purchase. This can save you money and ensure that you are paying a fair price for the car.

Reason 7. Legal Protection

In some cases, buying a car with a problematic title can lead to legal issues down the road. For example, if the car was previously stolen or has unresolved liens, you could face serious consequences. Protect yourself from these potential legal problems and ensure that your purchase is legitimate and trouble-free.

Final Say

Using a title checker when buying a used car is not just a precaution; it’s a smart and effective approach to ensure you make a wise investment. Don’t skip this crucial step – use a title checker to safeguard your used car purchase. By taking the time to thoroughly check the vehicle under consideration, you can drive with confidence, knowing that your new car is as reliable and safe as it should be.

Being a money laundering haven, which was the main obstacle to its EU membership, or a tourist destination is not enough for Turkey, a third world country, to play the role of a first class country in terms of economy and finance by earning dirty money. We can all hear now the sound of its moaning and the devastation of its economic machine as one of the consequences of a long economic stagnation. The country is suffering deeply from the pandemic of declining tourism revenues and the real weaknesses of its economy, the one that was fueled by investments from around the world and the sale of real estate. The question is: “How will Erdogan’s government manage to control the protests of the population in the wake of a 300% inflation rate?

No one expected good inflation figures

The new peak reached since the AKP succeeded President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in power 20 years ago is fueling debate about it. A journalist and law professor Ersan Sen argue loudly on television. Sen says 59 percent of people can’t get by on their money anymore. “And another 27 percent say they are about to.”

People in an Istanbul market describe how bad the situation is for them. There is talk of inflation as high as 50 percent in a few weeks. One man says he keeps a close eye on rising prices. “I go to the market twice a week, on Monday and Thursday. And I always shop at the same stalls. But even between Monday and Thursday, the prices go up,” he says. Government talks about good tradeIn contrast, if you listen to Turkish Finance Minister Nureddin Nebati, things don’t sound so crazy. In a speech after the announcement of the new inflation rate, he gives the impression that he is trying to say, “Crisis – what kind of crisis?” The economy’s capacity utilization is around 79 to 80 percent, Nebati says. “In fact, the Turkish economy and population are not only living with high inflation since the new figures were announced. Inflation has been in double digits for years. But this is eating away at both the reserves of companies and the savings of the country’s inhabitants.

Experts expect a further rise experts like Hakki Öztürk, from the renowned Bahcesehir University, do not see the situation easing. “Inflation can go up to 70 percent and then fall back a bit,” he says. “In the best case, it will be around 45 to 50 percent by the end of the year.” Personnel costs are low. By contrast, price increases in other areas are all the more significant. In the transport sector alone, official statistics indicate an inflation rate of about 100 percent per year. Energy prices, which have recently risen sharply internationally, are acting as a catalyst in Turkey, which has few raw materials and depends on imports.

Low interest rates for more investment

Government is primarily responsible, says expert Öztürk. In defiance of all economic principles, it has continued to lower interest rates. “If there had been no interest rate cut, neither the exchange rate would have been as bad, nor inflation as high – and interest rates on government bonds in dollars and Turkish lira would not be as high either,” says Öztürk.Low interest rates for more investment – that is the heart of the so-called Turkish economic model. Low interest rates for more investment – that’s the heart of the so-called Turkish economic model. it will take time for it to work, says Finance Minister Nebati. It’s true: interest rates are low relative to inflation. And the exchange rate of the lira against other currencies has also stabilized – albeit at a low level.and this will continue, says Nebati: “Then agriculture will produce more. There will also be a boom here because of the good weather. Trade is also alive – and hopefully the war will end soon. And: Our income from tourism will increase beyond our expectations.”

Concerns in the tourism industry

At the same time, tourism entrepreneurs are worried about the war in Ukraine. For recently, a few million Russians and Ukrainians have come to Turkey. But none of this is due to the misery in which the opposition sees the country. According to the spokesman for the largest opposition party, the CHP, Faik Öztrak, only the government is to blame. “They said they would make Turkey one of the ten largest economies. But they only placed it among the ten countries with the highest inflation in the world,” Öztrak said. “Who is responsible for all this? Who is the head of the government of this country? Of course: Recep Tayyip Erdogan.”

What if a possible Chinese invasion of Taiwan with the intention of obtaining (however politely!!!) the latest IC manufacturing technology results in the ashes of that technology? Isn’t it strategic to destroy at the right time the American technology used in TSMC making it inaccessible to the Chinese? The answer is ‘Yes’.

TSMC, for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, is today the most strategic company in the world. Because it is practically the only one who knows how to manufacture the latest generation electronic chips. Because these chips, also called semiconductors (from the name of the property of the silicon substrate), are everywhere, in our kitchens, our living rooms, our telephones, our cars and the machines that manufacture them.

But also because Taiwan, where they are produced, is at the center of a standoff between China and the United States which could very soon lead to an armed conflict. Fighter planes and battleships criss-cross the sky and the waters of the Taiwan Strait which separates the island from its communist big sister.

With in particular for stake, the control of TSMC. However, the science behind such technology must reside in minds smart enough to know how to control and even sabotage at the right time. It seems that by using this simple strategic technique to destroy such tech by installed right equipments, the Chinese will become more polite and perhaps less savage!

Trump’s policies toward China and the rest of the world, including Third World countries, will not give Biten any leverage as president. The global economy is expected to grow by 4% in 2021, provided that the initial rollout of COVID-19 vaccines results in massive vaccination campaigns throughout the year. However, the recovery is likely to remain modest if policymakers do not take decisive action to halt the pandemic and implement investment-friendly reforms, says the World Bank in its latest biennial edition of the World Economic Outlook .

Despite the recovery of the global economy after contracting 4.3% in 2020, the pandemic has taken a heavy toll in terms of morbidity and mortality and plunged millions into poverty. The U.S. election also ended with a victory for Biden. Thus, economic activity may be slowed for many months to come and income may fall significantly. The immediate priority for politicians is to stop the spread of the coronavirus and quickly organize mass vaccination campaigns. To sustain the recovery, authorities must also promote an investment cycle that promotes sustainable growth and is less reliant on public debt.

“As the global economy looks set for a timid recovery, policymakers face enormous challenges – whether in public health, debt management, fiscal policy, central bank action or structural reform – to ensure that this still fragile momentum is confirmed and lays the foundation for solid growth , said David Malpass, president of the World Bank Group . To overcome the impact of the pandemic and face the headwinds to investment, we need to give a decisive boost to efforts to improve the business environment, increase labor and product market flexibility, and improve transparency and accountability. governance. ”

The downturn in the global economy in 2020 is expected to be slightly less severe than expected, mainly due to a smaller contraction in advanced economies and a stronger recovery in China. On the other hand, activity in most emerging markets and developing economies has been more severely disrupted than expected.

“The financial weaknesses of most of these countries will also need to be addressed, as vulnerable households and businesses bear the brunt of the growth shocks ,” said Carmen Reinhart, vice president and chief economist of the World Bank Group .

The near-term outlook is highly uncertain, with different growth scenarios remaining possible, as outlined in the report. Under a pessimistic scenario of a continued increase in infection and a slowdown in vaccine deployment, the global economy could regain only 1.6% by 2021. In contrast, in the case of a containment of the pandemic and accelerated vaccination, the growth rate could reach almost 5%.

The rebound that began in advanced economies stalled in the third quarter of 2020, slowed by the increase in infections, raising fears of a slow and difficult recovery. After a contraction estimated at 3.6% for 2020, US GDP is expected to rebound to 3.5% in 2021. The Eurozone is expected to post growth of 3.6% in 2021, after contracting 7.4% in 2020. In Japan, activity is expected to increase by 2.5% in 2021, after contracting by 5.3% in 2020.

Total GDP in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs), including China, is expected to grow by 5% in 2021, after contracting 2.6% in 2020. China’s economy is expected to grow by 7.9%, up from 2% in 2020. Excluding China, projections for the EMDE group assume a 3.4% increase in 2021, following a 5% contraction in 2020. Activity in low-income economies would increase by 3.3% in 2021, following a 0.9% decline in 2020.

The analytical chapters of the latest edition of the World Economic Outlook focus on the amplifying effects of the pandemic on debt accumulation; its potential impact on long-term growth in the absence of coordinated reforms; and the risks associated with PIEs’ use of monetary policy in the form of asset purchase programs.

“The pandemic has greatly increased debt risks in emerging markets and developing economies, as slow growth threatens to further increase debt burdens and erode the ability of borrowing countries to secure their debts. repayment , emphasizes Ayhan Kose, World Bank Acting Vice President for the Equitable Growth, Finance and Investment Division

Within the framework of the China-Africa Cooperation Forum (FOCAC), Hunan Province has opened a base for agricultural development and cooperation between China and Africa.

This structure is tasked with establishing and developing cross-border “soft power” cooperation in areas such as agricultural production technologies, agricultural management systems and agricultural standards.

The structure will also provide intellectual support and a decision-making measure to promote the high-quality development of agricultural economic and trade cooperation between China and Africa.

Established by the Faculty of Economics of Hunan Agricultural University and affiliated with the China-Africa Economic and Trade Cooperation Research Institute, the base focuses on advanced agricultural science and technology and the integration of domestic and foreign agricultural research resources.

The research focuses on advanced theories, China-Africa agricultural production technologies, agricultural management systems and international trade in agricultural products.

The base will establish a series of centers for information and data, technology development and cooperation, talent training, as well as innovation in the China-Africa agricultural sector, to establish a think tank that is leading in the country and internationally renowned.

In September 2018, at the opening ceremony of the FOCAC Summit in Beijing, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced that in the next three years, the focus will be on implementing the “eight key initiatives” defined for China-Africa cooperation: industrial sector promotion, infrastructure connectivity, trade promotion, green development, capacity building, health, people-to-people exchanges, as well as peace and security.

Xi Jinping also clarified that “China will support Africa in its efforts to essentially achieve food security by 2030, and will develop and implement with Africa an action program for modernization cooperation, implement 50 agricultural assistance projects, provide emergency food aid of one billion yuan to affected African countries, send 500 high-level agronomists to Africa, and train young researchers for Africa eminent agronomists and pioneering agricultural entrepreneurs.”

According to statistics, China has signed memoranda of understanding or cooperation protocols on agriculture with nearly 20 countries in Africa. During this period, China has built agricultural technology demonstration centers in about 20 countries on the continent.

In addition to structures, China has sent nearly 100 groups of experts to nearly 40 African countries and tested more than 300 crop varieties on the African continent. “China is working hand in hand with a large number of developing countries, including African countries, to address global food challenges and achieve the Millennium Development Goals set by the United Nations,” the agency wrote. release, Xinhua.

While researchers have gone for 6G (5G and beyond) the US has decided to fund companies to compete with Huawei 5G! Still in the crosshairs of the United States, which has not frankly succeeded in dissuading their allied countries from providing at home equipment for 5G, Huawei and ZTE may not be at the end of their troubles. Parliamentarians have formulated a bill to finance the development of Western alternatives to Chinese telecom technologies, up to $ 1.25 billion.

A group of American parliamentarians, made up of Democratic and Republican senators, proposed a law Tuesday January 14, 2020 so that the federal government financially supports the development of “Western alternatives to the equipment of Chinese Huawei and ZTE ” . The United States would pay up to $ 1.25 billion. A way, according to these politicians who express fears for the national economy and security, to compensate for the important public subsidy granted to these companies by the Beijing government . Yet another measure when the United States has failed to push the allied countries to boycott the Chinese giants.

FINANCING AND RULES

The bill, titled Utilizing Strategic Allied (USA) Telecommunications, aims to “encourage competition against Huawei by capitalizing on American technological advantages and accelerating the adoption of an open architecture (O-RAN) , which would allow suppliers to enter the specific network components market . ” In detail, the text proposes that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) release $ 750 million – or 5% of its annual budget – to create a fund dedicated to R&D in mobile technologies and managed by an agency of the Department of Trade. The proposal also encourages the creation of a multilateral fund, financed with foreign partners and endowed with a budget of $ 500 million.

The implementation of a transition plan is also planned to help telecom operators of small size to buy future equipment compatible with the standards thus adopted. Parliamentarians also want to strengthen the weight of the United States in international standardization bodies and for the FCC to harmonize its frequency allocation procedure so as to ” create new opportunities for equipment manufacturers, while promoting economies of scale” .

“The decisions we make today around 5G will be felt over the decades to come. If the massive adoption of this technology has the potential to revolutionize the business world, it brings its own risks to national security. It would be disastrous if Huawei, which operates on behalf of the Chinese government, army and intelligence, seizes this market without being controlled. This text will help to maintain the competitive advantage and the integrity of the United States. , encouraging Westerners to develop innovative, accessible and safe alternatives, ” said Republican Senator Richard Burr, chairman of the Intelligence Committee.

TELECOM SUPPLIERS AND OPERATORS WELCOME THE TEXT

If the Democrats are united with the Republicans against the Chinese giants, they do, however, share differences over the conduct to adopt vis-à-vis Western countries. “The Trump administration is moralizing to our allies about the risks they face in relying on Chinese technology rather than working to replace it ,” said Senator Bob Menendez, member of the Committee on International Relations. ” This law, which will provide resources for the private sector, is the long-awaited first step in the right direction. As I said before, confronting China does not mean the same as competing with it.”

The industry has welcomed the bill with enthusiasm. “We support this text to move towards open and virtualized infrastructures, which will accelerate the integration and deployment of 5G while reducing costs. It will reinforce American innovation in the field of mobile technologies and provide telecom operators with options safer to build their network, ” responded VMware through the voice of Allwyn Sequeira, vice president of telecom and cloud products. Beyond the suppliers, the telecom operators also seem to find their account there.”Communications security is central to the economic prosperity of our nation. It requires industry, government and residents to work together to build and maintain standards. We are at the disposal of Congress to this measure is successful, ” said Robert Fisher, vice president in charge of federal government relations at Verizon.

Note that other players intend to capitalize on Huawei’s difficulties. The South Korean Samsung has, for example, bought TeleWold Solutions to launch into the 5G network infrastructure in the United States . The coming months will be crucial for the future of the sector.

According to a large international study carried out in France and in eight other countries by Coleman Parkes Research, large companies have significant data management shortcomings. The main cause is the lack of sanitation once the terminals have reached the end of their life.

Its title sums it up perfectly: “A false sense of security.” A study *, commissioned by the Blancco Technology group and carried out in August 2019 by Coleman Parkes Research, warns of poor practices in terms of data management. While computer attacks of all kinds are increasing internationally, large companies would demonstrate an “exaggerated trust” , unfounded, which would result in increasing the risk of hacking. If 61% of them say they are “very concerned” about them, 68% paradoxically admit that they use a large proportion of end-of-life devices … which makes them a target of choice.

POOR PRACTICE

Among the 1,850 business leaders surveyed, 251 are French. Based on their statements, the study estimates that around “one in two takes considerable risks when cleaning up the data” . Unsuitable methods, such as formatting, overwriting using non-certified tools or physical destruction (demagnetization, grinding) without audit, are at the top of the vulnerability factors (47%). Ways of doing things that “leave the door open to security and compliance problems” , according to the study, which points out that 8% of companies simply do not carry out remediation.

Another downside for companies: their annoying tendency to accumulate reserves of non-operational equipment on site – up to 87% of them in France, the maximum of the nine countries studied. Thus, only 2% declare immediately erasing data from end-of-life equipment, while 75% wait at least two weeks. “Failing to maintain a clear chain of responsibility” , 28% of large French companies even claim not to have an audit trail for the physical destruction process … and 36% say they do not record the serial number of the disks concerned.

A SITUATION TO ADDRESS IN EMERGENCY

The study reveals other trends. Out of 100 large French companies, 20 have not implemented a differentiated process for SSD and HDD drives, running the risk of not deleting all their data and of not complying with the standards in force. In addition, the companies surveyed reported that 20% of their devices are stored within their premises without being subject to specific measures. “A situation which highlights a huge security problem, which they must immediately remedy,” say the authors of this barometer.

“Large French companies worry about data when their devices reach the end of their life. Although they are aware of the risks involved, many of them still decide to adopt an inadequate protection approach , explains Fredrik Forslund, Vice President of Erasing Solutions for Large Businesses and Clouds at Blancco. This highlights huge, worrying gaps in this sector and among French leaders regarding the security and compliance implications of physical destruction and storage. equipment at end of life. ”

BETTER INTERNATIONAL, BUT THE SITUATION REMAINS PROBLEMATIC

Internationally, the situation seems slightly better … even if similar biases are noted. Many multinationals also claimed to use different methods of data deletion. Out of 100 companies surveyed: 17 declared to use physical destruction, 13 to erase or encrypt encryption, 12 to overwrite with free software and 7 using paid software. “It is particularly worrying to note that 4% of the foreign companies questioned do not use any method of data cleaning , ” notes the study.

Almost as many companies as in France admit to stocking IT equipment out of service (80%). Only 13% say they immediately erase their end-of-life equipment, compared to 57% within two weeks at best. When asked about their safety concerns related to end-of-life equipment, almost three-quarters of them (73%) agree that the number of end-of-life devices makes them vulnerable to data piracy and more than two thirds (68%) have real concerns about the risks of cyberattacks linked to these same devices. If, in France and abroad, awareness of the risks involved is developed, there are therefore far too few acts.

“The sleeping elephant has now started to run.” This quote from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi sums up the current economic situation of India, now the sixth largest economy in the world. In the second quarter of 2018, India’s growth reached 8.2% compared to the same period of the previous year. A figure well above that of China (6.7%), which is facing a slowdown confirmed.

This growth is due to the dynamism of domestic demand. The most promising sectors are manufacturing (+ 13.5%), construction (+ 8.7%) and agriculture (+ 5%). Three branches that employ a large workforce. At the same time, household consumption increased by two points, from 6.7% in the first quarter to 8.6% in the second quarter. The figures are therefore rather comfortable from a national point of view but also internationally. According to an IMF report released on August 8, 2018, India alone generates 15 percent of global economic growth.

The clash of inequalities
Nevertheless these impressive performances hide a more nuanced reality. In the third quarter, the Indian economy lost a point of growth (7.1%). Blame the global slowdown and trade tensions. And even if this drop in pace is not worrying, it highlights several problems weighing on the Indian economy. For example, how do you integrate every month the one million young people entering the job market? For India to create jobs at the scale of its needs, it would need at least 8% growth. “Any GDP below 8% has very important ramifications for the economy. Below 7 or 7.5%, this could potentially hinder job creation, “said Ashutosh Datar, an independent economist in New Delhi.

Another major challenge is that the Indian economy, although flourishing, is failing to overcome inequalities. According to the latest World Bank report on poverty: in 2012, more than 20 percent of India’s population (240 million people) lived on less than two dollars a day. The daily Hindustan Times, cited by Courrier International, was also concerned about the French crisis of yellow vests: “India is not totally immune to a similar phenomenon in many regions, farmers are struggling with an unprecedented agrarian crisis, while “too few jobs are created”. In addition, a report from Credit Suisse recently underlined, the inequality index went from 81.3 in 2013 to 85.4 in 2018, on a scale of 0 to 100. In these circumstances, warns the Indian daily,